nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 10, No.453 1-8
面向教师发展的无打扰评价:内涵阐释、价值审视与实践进路
基金项目(Foundation): 2023年度国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“面向教师数字能力发展的场景构建与应用研究”(课题编号:BCA230283)研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2024-10-10
出版时间: 2024-10-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

教师评价改革是促进教育领域创新变革与持续发展的重要因素,而近年来国际广受关注的无打扰评价则为教师发展评价提供了崭新的价值导向与实践指导。然而,“何以实现面向教师发展的无打扰评价”这一问题尚未得到解答。为此,该研究通过对无打扰评价的理念缘起与价值取向系统梳理,引申出对面向教师发展的无打扰的内涵阐释与价值审视,并基于此构建案例研究框架,对多个面向教师发展测评的典型案例开展分析。研究发现,当前教师发展评价正逐步与无打扰评价理念趋同,呈现出一些创新取向和实践难点,包括:(1)追求技术赋能的无感知数据采集和分析,但评估精准性有待提升;(2)追求真实教学行为的无衰减线上表征,但缺乏实践场景的适用性;(3)追求建立可映射、强关联的客观评价指标,但关联点选取仍具挑战。由此,提炼出面向教师发展的无打扰评价实施的关键流程,包括“统一理念、明确标准、建立映射、制定规范”四大核心要素,以期为新时代教师评价改革提供理论借鉴与实践引导。

Abstract:

Teacher evaluation reform is a crucial factor in promoting innovation and sustainable development in the educational field. In recent years, the internationally recognized concept of “non-intrusive evaluation” has provided new value orientations and practical guidance for teacher development evaluation. However, the question of “how to achieve non-intrusive evaluation aimed at teacher development”remains unanswered. This study systematically reviews the origin and value orientation of the concept of non-intrusive evaluation, elucidates and assesses its connotation concerning teacher development, and constructs a case study framework based on these insights. By analyzing multiple typical cases of teacher development evaluation, the study finds that current teacher development evaluations are gradually converging with the concept of non-intrusive evaluation, presenting some innovative orientations and practical challenges, including:(1) striving for technologically empowered, imperceptible data collection and analysis, though the precision of assessments needs improvement;(2) aiming for non-attenuated online representation of authentic teaching behaviors, yet lacking applicability in practical scenarios;(3) seeking to establish mappable, strongly correlated objective evaluation indicators, but the selection of correlation points remains challenging. Consequently, the study distills key processes for implementing non-intrusive evaluations aimed at teacher development, including the four core elements of “unified concepts, clear standards, mapping establishment, and norm formulation,” to provide theoretical references and practical guidance for teacher evaluation reform in the new era.

参考文献

[1]单俊豪,闫寒冰.学生数据赋能教师精准测评:问题、突破与发展路向[J].现代教育技术,2023,33(5):50-58.

[2]中华人民共和国中央人民政府.中共中央国务院印发《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5554488.htm,2020-10-13.

[3]王光明.教师专业发展智能化测评体系建构研究[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版),2023,(6):52-59.

[4]Shute V J,Ventura M,et al.Melding the power of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster learning[A].In:Ritterfeld U,Cody M J,Vorderer P,eds.Serious Games:Mechanisms and Effects[C].New York:Routledge,2009.295-321.

[5]Mc Carney R,Warner J,et al.The Hawthorne Effect:a randomised,controlled trial[J].BMC medical research methodology,2007,7(1):1-8.

[6]Wilson M,Sloane K.From principles to practice:An embedded assessment system[J].Applied measurement in education,2000,13(2):181-208.

[7]何克抗.关于形成性评估与隐形性评估--美国《教育传播与技术研究手册(第四版)》让我们深受启发的亮点之三[J].中国电化教育,2017,(6):24-29+79.

[8]Webb E J,Campbell D T,et al.Unobtrusive measures:Nonreactive research in the social sciences[M].Chicago:Rand Mc Nally,1966.

[9]Murai Y,Kim Y J,et al.Principles of Embedded Assessment in SchoolBased Making[EB/OL].https://osf.io/preprints/edarxiv/amvs2,2020-01-17.

[10][15]Fu A C,Kannan A,et al.Direct and unobtrusive measures of informal STEM education outcomes[J].New directions for evaluation,2019,(161):35-57.

[11]Shute V J,Ventura M,et al.Assessment and learning of qualitative physics in newton’s playground[J].The Journal of Educational Research,2013,106(6):423-430.

[12]Davis C,Del Bianco V,et al.Diverse and important ways evaluation can support and advance citizen science[J].Citizen Science:Theory and Practice,2022,7(1):12-23.

[13]Rus V,?tef?nescu D.Non-intrusive assessment of learners’prior knowledge in dialogue-based intelligent tutoring systems[J].Smart Learning Environments,2016,3:1-18.

[14]Sanders A,Boswell B,et al.Non-intrusive classroom attention tracking system (nicats)[C].Piscataway:IEEE,2021.1-9.

[16][21]朱龙,张洁等.数字转型视野下教师数字素养测评:发展动向、场景建构与实践建议[J].电化教育研究,2024,45(2):113-120.

[17]单俊豪.整合学生视角的STEM教师教学胜任力表现性评价研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2021.

[18]Wiliam D,Thompson M.Integrating assessment with learning:What will make it work[A].In:Dwyer C A,ed.The Future of Assessment:Shaping Teaching and Learning[C].New York:Routledge,2008.53-82.

[19]闫寒冰.信息化助力新时代基础教育公平:施为路径与实践逻辑[J].人民教育,2023,(7):11-15.

[20]张燕,程良宏.教师的深度学习如何深入:学习要素的视角[J].当代教育科学,2019,(8):45-51.

[22]Yin R K.Case study research:Design and methods[M].New York:Sage publications,1984.

[23]闫寒冰.管理团队信息化领导力[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2020.

[24][26][31]骆方,田雪涛等.教育评价新趋向:智能化测评研究综述[J].现代远程教育研究,2021,33(5):42-52.

[25]李亚婷,陈敏等.融合网络学习空间过程性数据的中小学教师信息素养评估研究[J].中国电化教育,2020,(9):119-128.

[27]闫寒冰,陈怡.数据智慧生成的实践路径:设计、管理与治理[J].现代远距离教育,2023,(2):53-60.

[28][美]洛林安德森,[美]大卫克鲁瓦索夫等.蒋小平,张琴美等译.布鲁姆教育目标分类学修订版(完整版):分类学视野下的学与教及其测评[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2009.62.

[29]王怀波,柴唤友等.智能技术赋能学生综合素养评价:框架设计与实施路径[J].中国电化教育,2022,(8):16-23.

[30]魏非,章玉霞等.微认证赋能师范生教师职业能力精准测评研究[J].中国电化教育,2021,(12):79-86.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G451

引用信息:

[1]闫寒冰,陈怡,余淑珍.面向教师发展的无打扰评价:内涵阐释、价值审视与实践进路[J].中国电化教育,2024,No.453(10):1-8.

基金信息:

2023年度国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“面向教师数字能力发展的场景构建与应用研究”(课题编号:BCA230283)研究成果

发布时间:

2024-10-10

出版时间:

2024-10-10

检 索 高级检索