nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 11, No.454 95-101+127
群体学习理论视角下的教研群体认知发展的研究与实践
基金项目(Foundation): 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“生成式人工智能影响创造性过程的内在机制及干预策略研究”(项目编号:24YJC880014)研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

以学习型组织开展群体学习是教师专业发展的趋势,如何促进群体学习中教师从个体认知到群体认知的转化,促进积极的意义建构进而提高群体认知的水平需结合相关理论开展实证探索。该研究基于群体学习理论构建包含知识共享、知识存储、知识重取三阶段的教研模式,并设计相应的策略和支架。之后在某市以小学语文教师为研究对象,以基于群体学习理论的教研为实验组、传统教研为对照组,开展共历时3个学期的12次校本教研活动。通过认知网络分析方法对教研过程数据进行群体认知特征及发展趋势比较分析,结果表明传统教研活动中群体认知发展难以实现高层级迁移,更多地停留在知识的分享与建构,而基于群体学习理论的教研活动有利于促进群体达到知识的交互迁移。

Abstract:

The professional development of teachers is increasingly trending towards group learning within learning organizations. How to promote teachers' transformation from individual cognition to group cognition in group learning, to promote positive meaning construction and then to improve the level of group cognition needs to be explored empirically. Based on the group learning theory, this study constructed a teaching research model that included three stages:knowledge sharing, knowledge storage and knowledge retrieval, with the corresponding strategies and scaffolds designed. Afterwards, 12 teaching research activities lasting for 3 semesters were carried out with the primary school Chinese teachers in a city as participants, taking the teaching research staff based on the group learning theory as the experimental group, and taking the staff with traditional teaching research methods as the control group. The cognitive network analysis method was used to compare and analyze the characteristics and development trend of group cognition in the teaching research process. The results show that the development of group cognition in traditional teaching research activities is difficult to realize high-level transfer, but often stays at knowledge sharing and construction; however, the teaching research activities based on the group learning theory can promote interactive knowledge transfer of by groups.

参考文献

[1]Darling-hammond L,Hyler M,et al.Effective Teacher Professional Development[R].Learning Policy Institute,2017.

[2]中共中央国务院.关于全面深化新时代教师队伍建设改革的意见[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-01/31/content_5262659.htm,2024-04-03.

[3][10]王晓芳,侯舒艨.组织学习视角下教师学习过程中知识的多层次转换--一项个案比较研究[J].全球教育展望,2019,48(9):114-128.

[4][12]Argote L,Miron-spektor E.Organizational Learning:From Experience to Knowledge[J].Organization Science,2011,22(5):1123-1137.

[5][27]刘电芝,王秀丽.国外关于群体认知过程的研究--合作学习研究的新思路[J].全球教育展望,2008,(3):41-45.

[6]Theiner G.A Beginner’s Guide to Group Minds[A].Sprevak,M.,Kallestrup,J.(Eds).New Waves in Philosophy of Mind[C].London:Palgrave Macmillan,2014.301-322.

[7][15]王辞晓,刘文辉.理解与表征群体认知的新视角:协作脚本中的角色互动[J].现代远程教育研究,2023,35(2):102-112.

[8]Hoban G.Teacher learning for educational change:a systems thinking approach[M].Buckingham&Philadelphia:Open University Press,2002.

[9]Verloo N,Van Driel J,et al.Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching[J].International Journal of Educational Research,2001,35(5):441-461.

[11]Lewin K.Frontiers in group dynamics:II.Channels of group life;social planning and action research[J].Human Relations,1947,1(1):143-153.

[13]Wilson J M,Goodman P S,et al.Group Learning[J].The Academy of Management Review,2007,32(4):1041-1059.

[14][32]金智慧,施建军.群体学习研究前沿述评[J].经济管理,2008,(8):36-40.

[16]张钢,乐晨.基于集体意向性理论的群体认知过程重构:以组织中的团队为例[J].科学技术哲学研究,2016,33(6):88-93.

[17]刘智,穆瑞等.群体学习讨论中认知-主题联合建模及其对学习成效的影响研究--基于讨论引导方式的调节作用[J].远程教育杂志,2023,41(2):70-81.

[18]张涛,张烁等.在线同伴互评中群体认知的特征、网络与发展轨迹分析[J].现代教育技术,2022,32(9):82-90.

[19]李定仁.论教学研究[J].教育研究,2000,(11):45-49.

[20]魏晓宇.教师知识共享的行为与过程--基于动态性的视角[J].基础教育,2021,18(6):61-71.

[21]周春红,陈向东.教师协作中的集体效能感:共享调节的视角[J].远程教育杂志,2021,39(2):72-84.

[22]Bock G W,Kim Y G.Breaking the Myths of Rewards:An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing[J].Information Resources Management Journal,2002,15(2):14-21.

[23]Abrams L C,Cross R,et al.Nurturing Interpersonal Trust in Knowledge-Sharing Networks[J].Academy of Management Perspectives,2003,17(4):64-77.

[24]包凤耐,曹小龙.基于社会资本视角的虚拟社区知识共享研究[J].统计与决策,2014,(19):53-56.

[25]谢幼如,宋乃庆等.基于问题的网络课堂协作知识建构模式[J].电化教育研究,2010,(1):36-38+47.

[26]王陆,郑志生等.大数据赋能循证课例研究中的知识治理[J].电化教育研究,2021,42(12):5-12+20.

[28]Lee G,Kwon J S.What Do We Know about Students’Cognitive Conflict in Science Classroom:A Theoretical Model of Cognitive Conflict Process[A].Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science[C].Costa Mesa,CA:ERIC,2001.1-19.

[29]马宁,崔志军等.以协同知识建构为核心的教师混合式研训效果研究--基于内容分析的方法[J].中国电化教育,2018,(9):117-122+131.

[30]刘伟,戚万学等.致力于知识迁移的深度学习探究[J].现代教育技术,2019,29(3):25-31.

[31]曹鹭.有效失败与知识迁移:理论、机制与原则[J].开放教育研究,2021,27(3):4-14.

[33]Chi M T H,Wylie R.The ICAP framework:Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes[J].Educational Psychologist,2014,49(4):219-243.

[34]吴忭,王戈.协作编程中的计算思维发展轨迹研究--基于量化民族志的分析方法[J].现代远程教育研究,2019,(2):76-84+94.

[35]冷静,易玉何等.职前教师协作写作中反思能力发展轨迹研究--基于认知网络分析法[J].中国电化教育,2020,(3):93-99.

[36]Hargreaves A.Teaching in the Knowledge Society:Education in the age of insecurity[M].New York:Teachers College Press,2003.

[37]Penuel W R,Fishman B J,et al.What Makes Professional Development Effective?Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation[J].American Educational Research Journal,2007,44(4):921-958.

[38]Scardamalia M,Beriter C.Knowledge Building:Theory,Pedagogy,and Technology[A].R.K.SAWYER.The Cambridge handbook of:The learning sciences[C].New York:Cambridge University Press,2006:97-115.

[39]Brown A L,Campione J C.Guided discovery in a community of learners[A].K.MCGILLY.Classroom lessons:Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice[C].Cambridge:The MIT Press,1994:229-270.

[40]郭炯.教师实践性知识的组织结构及生成途径研究[J].中国电化教育,2012,(11):71-75.

[41]杨多.时代挑战与教师自我完善[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2005,(3),371-373.

[42]刘璇,郑燕林.活动理论视角下的教师共同体教研模式研究与实践[J].中国电化教育,2023,(4):122-129.

[43]梁友明,王陆.循证课例研究中优化教学反思的知识治理路向[J].电化教育研究,2022,43(9):98-105+113.

[44]陈鹏,梁友明等.大数据循证课例赋能知识建构与教学改进的研究[J].中国电化教育,2023,(4):99-106+121.

[45]李阳,曾祥翊.人工智能赋能教研高质量发展:智能精准教研的理论框架、实践蓝图与发展脉络[J].中国电化教育,2022,(11):99-107+122.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:G623.2

引用信息:

[1]陈鹏,梁友明,曹丽娜.群体学习理论视角下的教研群体认知发展的研究与实践[J].中国电化教育,2024,No.454(11):95-101+127.

基金信息:

教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“生成式人工智能影响创造性过程的内在机制及干预策略研究”(项目编号:24YJC880014)研究成果

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文