| 4,614 | 53 | 118 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
线上线下教学是否“同质”的问题，一直以来缺乏基于真实教评数据的实证研究。该研究立足清华大学在线教学学期本科生课程的有效教学评估数据，全面分析和环比线下教学的教学评估数据，来真实展现全国高校线上教学的教学质量及影响因素，填补了这一空白。研究结果显示，疫情期间线上课程取得令人满意的教学质量。课程容量、教师教龄、学生年级和课程类型等均对线上教学的质量产生影响。随着后疫情时代融合式教学形式的开展，教学形式呈现更加多样化。该文针对如何提高新形式下混合式教学的教学质量，分别对教师、学校提出了相应的建议。
Abstract：To evaluate online teaching quality at Tsinghua University, student rating results of teaching effectiveness for 2130 undergraduate courses were collected after the spring semester during COVID-19 of 2020. A comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted. The results were further compared to the in-class teaching quality evaluation from the spring semester of 2019. It indicates that the quality of online teaching at Tsinghua University was highly recognized among students, and the distribution of online teaching evaluation was close to the distribution of in-class teaching evaluation. The size of courses, the course category and instructor's teaching age may impact the teaching effectiveness. It was suggested that instructors should embrace the student-oriented teaching concept, and implement various teaching modes. Constant support should be provided to senior instructors, such as series of trainings for web technologies.
[1]程曦.全面如期开课，履行社会责任：校长邱勇调研疫情防控期间学校教学工作安排[EB/OL].https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1684/69024.htm,2020-02-06.
[2]胡小平,谢作栩.疫情下高校在线教学的优势与挑战探析[J].中国高教研究,2020,(4):18-22.
[3]杨海军,张惠萍等.新冠肺炎疫情期间高校在线教学探析[J].中国多媒体与网络教学学报,2020,(10):194-196.
[4]吴砥.在线教学必须重视的三个难点和三个误区[N].中国教育报,2020-02-22(03).
[5][13]Quezada,R.L.,C.Talbot,et al.From Bricks and Mortar to Remote Teaching:A Teacher Education Programme’s Response to COVID-19[J].Journal of Education for Teaching,2020,(46):472-483.
[6]Bao,W..COVID-19 and Online Teaching in Higher Education:ACase Study of Peking University[J].Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies,2020,2(2):113-115.
[7]Bozkurt,A.,R.C.Sharma.Emergency Remote Teaching in a Time of Global Crisis Due to Corona Virus Pandemic[J].Asian Journal of Distance Education,2020,15(1):i-vi.
[8]Huber,S.G.,C.Helm.COVID-19 and Schooling:Evaluation,Assessment and Accountability in Times of Crises-reacting Quickly to Explore Key Issues for Policy,Practice and Research with the School Barometer[J].Educational Assessment,Evaluation and Accountability,2020,(32):237-270.
[9]乔伟峰,刘威童等.学生眼里的在线教学：行为、效果与挑战--基于新冠疫情期间清华大学学生在线学习行为调查[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,42(1):57-66.
[10][14]黄文祥,李亚东等.我国本科高校线上教学的质量状况、评价及建议[J].中国高等教育,2020,(8):21-24.
[11]Spady,W.Outcome-based education:Critical issues and answers[M].Arlington,VA:American Association of School Administrators,1994.
[12]陈武元,曹荭蕾.“双一流”高校在线教学的实施现状与思考[J].教育科学,2020,36(2):24-30.
[15]王竹立.后疫情时代，教育应如何转型?[J].电化教育研究,2020,(4):13-20.
[16]胡小平,谢作栩.疫情下高校在线教学的优势与挑战探析[J].中国高教研究,2020,(4):18-22.
[17]周创兵等.推进构建“书院制”人才培养新体系[J].中国高等教育,2021,(2):29-31.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G434;G642
引用信息:
[1]王江典,沈翀,杨蕾,等.线上和线下本科教学质量的比较分析——基于清华大学教学评估数据[J].中国电化教育,2022,No.422(03):90-95+102.
基金信息:
清华大学统计咨询中心、清华大学教学质量评估中心项目(项目编号：ZY01＿01)研究成果;清华大学教学改革项目(项目编号：ZY01＿01)资助
2022-03-09
2022-03-09