| 2,881 | 6 | 717 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
跨学科主题学习是培养中小学生核心素养、应对未来挑战的关键手段，在新课程改革中占据重要地位。构建科学、全面的跨学科主题学习成效测评体系是确保跨学科教育质量的关键。该研究基于柯氏模型，通过两轮专家咨询构建了测评框架，并基于学生自我评估的测评量表进行验证，形成了包含满意度、素养、投入度和结果的中小学跨学科主题学习成效测评模型。通过对全国31个省市自治区参与过跨学科主题学习的11062名中小学生进行调查，发现跨学科主题学习成效整体良好，但学段、地区(城区与非城区)及参与频次不同的学生在成效上存在显著差异。最后，研究从重视学生跨学科素养培育、关注跨学科教育均衡发展两方面提出了建议。
Abstract：Interdisciplinary thematic learning serves as a crucial means of cultivating core competencies among primary and secondary school students, preparing them to address future challenges. It occupies a significant place in the new curriculum reform. Constructing a scientific and comprehensive evaluation system for interdisciplinary thematic learning effectiveness is essential to ensure the quality of interdisciplinary education. Based on the Kirkpatrick model, this study developed an evaluation framework through two rounds of expert consultation. It was subsequently validated using a self-assessment scale for students, resulting in an evaluation model that encompasses satisfaction, competency,engagement, and outcomes. A survey involving 11,062 primary and secondary school students who had participated in interdisciplinary thematic learning across 31 provinces and autonomous regions nationwide revealed an overall positive effectiveness. However, significant differences in effectiveness were observed among students at different educational stages, regions(urban versus non-urban), and participation frequencies. Ultimately, this study concludes with recommendations emphasizing the cultivation of students' interdisciplinary competencies and advocating for the balanced development of interdisciplinary education.
[1]中华人民共和国教育部.教育部关于印发义务教育课程方案和课程标准(2022年版)的通知[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/202204/t20220420_619921.html,2022-03-25.
[2][22][25][43][44]中国教育科学研究院课程与教学研究所课题组,郝志军等.中小学跨学科课程融合的问题与对策[J].课程.教材.教法,2022,42(10):60-69.
[3]聂竹明,施羽晗,韩锡斌等.跨学科主题学习活动设计系统性思考:困境与策略[J].中国电化教育,2024,(10):94-102.
[4]高慧斌.中小学教师远程培训效果实证研究[J].教育研究,2018,39(4):98-110.
[5]李俊堂,钱玮.跨学科主题学习的评价设计要点[J].中小学管理,2023,(5):24-27.
[6][9][美]唐纳德L·柯克帕特里克,詹姆斯D·柯克帕特里克.奚卫华,林祝君等译.如何做好培训评估:柯氏四级评估法[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007.22.
[7]Donald L K,James D K.Evaluating training programs:the four levels[M].San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler Publishers,Inc,2006.21-26.
[8]钟晨.高职学校社会实践育人成效评价体系建构与实证研究[J].实验技术与管理,2020,37(11):235-240.
[10]Lim L,Lim S H,et al.Measuring Learner Satisfaction of an Adaptive Learning System[J].Behavioral Sciences,2022,12(8):264.
[11]Khosravi A A,Poushaneh K,et al.Determination of Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction of Islamic Azad University[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013,84:579-583.
[12]Chadwick K,Ward J.Determinants of consumer satisfaction with education:Implications for college&university administrators[J].College and University,1987(3):236-246.
[13]褚宏启.核心素养的国际视野与中国立场--21世纪中国的国民素质提升与教育目标转型[J].教育研究,2016,37(11):8-18.
[14]高欣峰,陈丽.信息素养、数字素养与网络素养使用语境分析--基于国内政府文件与国际组织报告的内容分析[J].现代远距离教育,2021,(2):70-80.
[15][23]詹泽慧,季瑜,赖雨彤.新课标导向下跨学科主题学习如何开展：基本思路与操作模型[J].现代远程教育研究,2023,35(1):49-58.
[16]Singh A K,Srivastava S.Development and Validation of Student Engagement Scale in the Indian Context[J].Global Business Review,2014,15(3):505-515.
[17]Krause K,Coates H.Students’engagement in first-year university[J].Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education,2008,33(5):493-505.
[18]解冰,高瑛.英语写作在线同伴反馈学习投入评价量表编制与分析[J].外语电化教学,2022,(5):52-58+112.
[19]杨立军,韩晓玲.基于NSSE-CHINA问卷的大学生学习投入结构研究[J].复旦教育论坛,2014,12(3):83-90.
[20][21]Fredricks J,Mc Colskey W.Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school:a description of 21 instruments[EB/OL].https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED514996.pdf,2024-07-15.
[24]李广平,陈武元.从设置现状到实施效果:对我国高校通识课程质量的反思[J].中国高教研究,2023,(7):82-88.
[26]伍红林,田莉莉.跨学科主题学习:溯源、内涵与实施建议[J].全球教育展望,2023,52(3):35-47.
[27]陈艳茹.素养培育视角下跨学科主题学习设计案例研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2022.
[28]Hasson F,Keeney S,Mckenna H.Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique[J].J Adv Nurs,2000,32(4):1008-1015.
[29]徐国祥.统计预测和决策[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2005.11.
[30]黄晓磊,邓友超.学校活力评价指标体系构建--基于德尔菲法的调查分析[J].教育学报,2017,13(1):23-31.
[31]华子荀,许力等.面向教师专业发展的实践共同体评价模型研究[J].中国电化教育,2020,(5):101-110.
[32]Harmandao?lu Baz E,Cephe P T.English student teachers’behavioral intention to use information and communication technologies[J].Education and Information Technologies,2022,27(8):10809-10841.
[33][39]宋乃庆,王丽美.中小学教师跨学科素养测评模型的构建研究[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2024,23(1):103-111.
[34]Kaiser H F,Rice J.Little Jiffy,Mark Iv[J].Educational and Psychological Measurement,1974,34(1):111-117.
[35]张小玲,赵梦雪等.军人自我形象量表的编制及其与心理健康状态的关系[J].陆军军医大学学报,2022,44(19):1938-1945.
[36]Ahmed E,Ward R.Analysis of factors influencing acceptance of personal,academic and professional development e-portfolios[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2016,63:152-161.
[37]Nunnally J C,Bernstein I H.Psychometric theory(3版)[M]..New Delhi:Tata Mcgraw-Hill Ed,1994.
[38]Hair J,Babin B J,et al.Multivariate data analysis(8版)[M].Andover,Hampshire,United Kingdom:Cengage Learning Emea,2019.
[40]董艳,夏亮亮等.新课标背景下的跨学科学习:内涵、设置逻辑、实践原则与基础[J].现代教育技术,2023,33(2):24-32.
[41]宋歌,王祖浩.国际科学教育中的跨学科素养:背景、定位与研究进展[J].全球教育展望,2019,48(10):28-43.
[42]陈丹,崔亚雪等.跨学科主题学习的实践属性及其路径选择[J].天津师范大学学报(基础教育版),2023,24(4):1-6.
[45]罗士琰,张辉蓉等.小学生跨学科素养测评模型构建与应用研究[J].中国电化教育,2024,(5):9-16.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G632.4
引用信息:
[1]吴鹏泽,胡晓玲,李冰.跨学科主题学习成效测评模型的构建与应用：基于学生自我评估视角[J].中国电化教育,2025,No.459(04):66-74.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金教育学(全国教育科学规划)2024年国家一般课题“数据与知识双驱的中小学教师跨学科教学胜任力发展研究”(课题编号：BCA240053)研究成果
2025-04-02
2025-04-02