nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2023, 11, No.442 83-90
基于风险性监管的AIGC教育应用伦理风险治理研究
基金项目(Foundation): 全国教育科学规划2021年度国家一般课题“教育领域人工智能应用的伦理风险与防范对策研究”(课题编号:BCA210086)研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2023-11-10
出版时间: 2023-11-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

爆火出圈的ChatGPT为AIGC的发展带来了重大突破,也使教育领域从普适走向个性、从单一走向多样、从零散走向整合,人工智能赋能教育进入新阶段,随之也面临AIGC带来的一系列伦理风险,引起教育工作者的高度关注,需要从风险性监管视角来处理AIGC教育应用的伦理风险。该文首先从“人-技术”交互角度归纳AIGC教育应用四类伦理风险:算法相关伦理风险、数据相关伦理风险、技术相关伦理风险和应用相关伦理风险。其次以风险性监管流程为基础制定AIGC教育应用伦理风险的治理框架,依据治理框架对四类伦理风险按照“归纳-运行-分级”的顺序实行监管:在总结伦理风险已有的治理依据后构建“5W1H”监管模型,对伦理风险进行编码后实现高、中、低三类分级。以此系统化的监管流程为应对AIGC教育应用伦理风险提供借鉴,对AIGC时代赋能教育的伦理使用指南提供指向性的引领,推动教育领域这场持久变革的健康化发展。

Abstract:

ChatGPT, which bursts out of the circle, has brought a major breakthrough in the development of AIGC, and also made the field of education move from universal to individuality, from single to diversity, from fragmentation to integration, and AIenabled education enter a new stage, and then also face a series of ethical risks brought by AIGC, which arouses great concern among educators and requires a risky regulatory perspective to deal with the ethical application of AIGC education. Risks. Firstly, the four types of ethical risks of AIGC educational applications are summarized from the perspective of “human-technology” interaction:algorithm-related ethical risks, data-related ethical risks, technology-related ethical risks and application-related ethical risks.Secondly, we formulate a governance framework for ethical risks of AIGC educational applications based on the risk-based regulatory process, and implement the regulation of the four types of ethical risks in the order of “generalization-operation-grading” based on the governance framework: after summarizing the existing governance basis for ethical risks, we construct the “5W1H” regulatory model is constructed after summarizing the existing ethical risk management basis, and the ethical risks are coded and graded into three categories: high, medium and low. This systematic regulatory process provides a reference for addressing the ethical risks of AIGC educational applications, and provides guidance for the ethical use of empowered education in the AIGC era to promote the healthy development of this lasting change in education.

参考文献

[1]王文礼,龙显芝.推进教育4.0建设:实现以人为本的复苏[J].开放教育研究,2023,29(2):36-45.

[2]王佑镁,王旦等.“阿拉丁神灯”还是“潘多拉魔盒”:Chat GPT教育应用的潜能与风险[J].现代远程教育研究,2023,35(2):48-56.

[3]何哲,曾润喜等.Chat GPT等新一代人工智能技术的社会影响及其治理[J].电子政务,2023,244(4):2-24.

[4]杨欣.基于生成式人工智能的教育转型图景--Chat GPT究竟对教育意味着什么[J].中国电化教育,2023,(5):1-8+14.

[5]黄正艳,郑原斌等.安全合规多标准管理体系融合与实践[J].信息技术与标准化,2022,(5):199-205+212.

[6]Dwivedi Y K,Kshetri N,et al.“So what if Chat GPT wrote it?”Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities,challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research,practice and policy[J].International Journal of Information Management,2023,71:102642.

[7]王鉴,姜纪垒.中国共产党立德树人教育思想的百年历程与基本经验[J].教育研究,2021,42(7):16-26.

[8]杨欣.基于生成式人工智能的教育转型图景--Chat GPT究竟对教育意味着什么[J].中国电化教育,2023,(5):1-8+14.

[9]吴军其,吴飞燕等.Chat GPT赋能教师专业发展:机遇、挑战和路径[J].中国电化教育,2023,(5):15-23+33.

[10]冯建军.我们如何看待Chat GPT对教育的挑战[J].中国电化教育,2023,(7):1-6+13.

[11]郑伟,张嘉禹.澳大利亚职业教育与培训机构的风险防控与监管--基于《风险监管框架》的分析[J].现代教育论丛,2022,248(6):75-83+111-112.

[12]李树旺,李京律,梁媛等.高校体育课堂风险识别与评估研究[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2021,40(6):25-33.

[13]冯磊.基于风险监管的注册制--英格兰高等教育治理新框架的构成与特征[J].外国教育研究,2021,48(10):69-84.

[14]赵磊磊,蒋馨培等.困境与路径:人工智能时代学校教育竞争力发展研究[J].杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版),2022,44(5):70-77.

[15]刘成,张丽.“刷脸”治理的应用场景与风险防范[J].学术交流,2021,328(7):151-162.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G434

引用信息:

[1]王佑镁,王旦,王海洁,等.基于风险性监管的AIGC教育应用伦理风险治理研究[J].中国电化教育,2023,No.442(11):83-90.

基金信息:

全国教育科学规划2021年度国家一般课题“教育领域人工智能应用的伦理风险与防范对策研究”(课题编号:BCA210086)研究成果

发布时间:

2023-11-10

出版时间:

2023-11-10

检 索 高级检索