| 5,303 | 30 | 508 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
跨学科素养是小学生学习发展的关键素养，构建科学、合理的跨学科素养测评模型是开展小学生跨学科素养有效监测与提升的重要保证，对打破学科知识壁垒、培育新时代拔尖创新人才具有重要现实意义。研究遵循成熟的教育测评模型构建范式，厘清了小学生跨学科素养操作性定义，构建了包含跨学科知识、跨学科能力和跨学科情意3个一级指标、8个二级指标的小学生跨学科素养测评指标体系，开发了《小学生跨学科素养测评量表》，基于探索性、验证性因素分析以及层次分析法，构建了小学生跨学科素养测评模型：Y=0.306*Y1+0.412*Y2+0.282*Y3，其中Y表示小学生跨学科素养，Y1、Y2、Y3分别表示跨学科知识、跨学科能力、跨学科情意。应用该模型对全国东、中、西部地区12省市的18166名小学4—6年级学生进行测评，初步验证了模型的科学性、有效性与可操作性，并依据测评结果提出提升小学生跨学科素养的对策建议。
Abstract：Interdisciplinary competency is a key competency for primary school students' learning and development. Constructing a scientific and reasonable interdisciplinary competency evaluation model is an important guarantee for effectively monitoring and improving primary school students' interdisciplinary competency. It has important practical significance in breaking down disciplinary knowledge barriers and cultivating top-notch innovative talents in the new era. The research follows a mature paradigm for constructing educational evaluation models,clarifies the operational definition of interdisciplinary competency for primary school students, constructs a primary school interdisciplinary competency evaluation index system that includes three primary indicators of interdisciplinary knowledge, interdisciplinary ability, and interdisciplinary sentiment, and eight secondary indicators. The “Primary School Interdisciplinary competency Evaluation Scale” has been developed, based on exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process, A cross disciplinary competency evaluation model for primary school students was constructed: Y=0.306*Y1+0.412*Y2+0.282*Y3, where Y represents the cross disciplinary competency of primary school students, and Y1, Y2, Y3 respectively represent cross disciplinary knowledge, cross disciplinary ability, cross disciplinary sentiment. The model was applied to evaluate 18166 primary school students in grades 4-6 from 12 provinces and cities in the eastern,central, and western regions of China, preliminarily verifying the scientific, effective, and operable nature of the model. Finally, based on the evaluation results, proposing suggestions to improve primary school students' interdisciplinary competency.
[1]中华人民共和国教育部.中共中央、国务院印发《中国教育现代化2035》[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201902/t20190223_370857.html,2019-02-03.
[2]中华人民共和国中央人民政府.习近平:高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗--在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm,2022-10-25.
[3]中华人民共和国教育部.教育部关于印发义务教育课程方案和课程标准(2022年版)的通知[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/s8001/202204/t20220420_619921.html,2022-03-25.
[4]范涌峰,宋乃庆.大数据时代的教育测评模型及其范式构建[J].中国社会科学,2019,(12):139-155.
[5]宋乃庆,罗士琰.学生阅读素养测评指标体系构建研究--以小学生为例[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,(4):201-206.
[6]张辉蓉,杨欣等.初中生信息技术素养测评模型构建研究[J].中国电化教育,2017,(9):33-38.
[7]李艳琴,宋乃庆.小学低段数学符号意识的含义及其表现形式[J].课程·教材·教法,2016,(3):92-97.
[8]李化侠,辛涛等.小学生统计思维测评模型构建[J].教育研究与实验,2018,(2):77-83.
[9]范涌峰,宋乃庆.学校特色发展测评模型构建研究[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2018,(2):68-78.
[10]刘仲林.交叉科学时代的交叉研究[J].科学学研究,1993,(2):11-18+4.
[11]Klein J T.Interdisciplinarity and complexity:An evolving relationship[J].E-CO Special Double Issue,2004,(6):2-10.
[12]Lisa R,Lattuca.Creating Interdisciplinarity:Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty[M].Nashville:Vanderbilt University Press,2001.21.
[13]Gheorghe Zaman,Zizi Goschin.Multidisciplinarity,Interdisciplinari ty and Transdisciplinarity:Theoretical approaches and Implications for the Strategy of Post-Crisis Sustainable Development[J].Theoretical and Applied Economics,2010,(12):5-20.
[14]杜惠洁,舒尔茨.德国跨学科教学理念与教学设计分析[J].全球教育展望,2005,(8):28-32.
[15]张玉华.核心素养视域下跨学科学习的内涵认识与实践路径[J].上海教育科研,2022,(5):57-63.
[16]蔡清田.课程改革中素养与能力[J].教育研究月刊,2010,(12):93-104.
[17]Mansilla V B,Duraising E D.Targeted assessment of students’interdisciplinary work:An empirically grounded framework proposed[J].The Journal of Higher Education,2007,(2):215-237.
[18]Lattuca L R Knight D,Bergom I.Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence[J].International Journal of Engineering Education,2013,(3):726-739.
[19]Repko,A.F.,Szostak,R.et al.Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,2019.177.
[20]宋歌,王祖浩.国际科学教育中的跨学科素养:背景、定位与研究进展[J].全球教育展望,2019,(10):28-43.
[21]宋歌,管珏琪.面向整合式STEM的教师跨学科素养：结构模型与发展路径[J].现代远程教育研究,2022,(3):58-66.
[22]董奇.心理与教育研究方法[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004.144.
[23]郑杭生,李强等.社会指标理论研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1991.2.
[24]David B.Knight,Lisa R.Lattuca,et al.Understanding Interdisciplinarity:Curricular and Organizational Features of Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Programs[J].Innovative Higher Education,2013,(38):143-158.
[25]Haynes,Carolyn.Innovations in Interdisciplinary Teaching[M].Westport:Greenwood Press,2002.21.
[26][美]贝兰卡,查普曼等.夏惠贤译.多元智能与多元评价:运用评价促进学生发展[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004.29.
[27]Klein J T.Interdisciplinarity:history,theory,and practice[M].Detroit:Wayne state university press,1990.224.
[28]陈重穆,宋乃庆.淡化形式，注重实质:兼论《九年义务教育全日制初级中学数学教学大纲》[J].数学教育学报,1993,(2):4-9.
[29]杨良斌.信息分析方法与实践[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,2016.27-40.
[30]朱庆华,陈铭.信息分析:基础、方法及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.77-85.
[31]吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务--SPSSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.233.
[32]吴明隆.结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[33]邱均平,文庭孝.评价学--理论·方法·实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2015.196-198.
[34]张和生,余军民等.高考公平指数的建构与测评--以湖南省为例[J].北京大学教育评论,2013,(1):29-42+190.
[35]沈汪兵,刘昌等.创造性思维的性别差异[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(8):1380-1389.
[36]Cheung,P.C.,Laub,S.Gender differences in the creativity of Hong Kong school children:Comparison by using the new electronic Wallach-Kogan creativity tests[J].Creativity Research Journal,2010,(2):194-199.
[37]朱德全,彭洪莉.教师跨学科教学素养测评模型实证研究[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2023,(2):1-13.
[38]王福兴,沃建中等.言语、图形任务条件下青少年发散性思维的差异研究[J].心理科学,2009,(1):29-33.
[39]梁舒婷,李臣之.中小学教师跨学科教学胜任力测评与提升[J].全球教育展望,2023,52(8):87-99.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G622.4
引用信息:
[1]罗士琰,张辉蓉,宋乃庆,等.小学生跨学科素养测评模型构建与应用研究[J].中国电化教育,2024,No.448(05):9-16.
基金信息:
重庆市教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度重大招标课题“重庆市教育评价改革研究”(课题编号：2021-ZD-01); 2022年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“西南民族地区小学生阅读素养增值评价及高质量提升策略研究”(项目编号：22YJC880051)研究成果
2024-05-10
2024-05-10