| 2,181 | 0 | 147 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
虽然高质量普及义务教育是世界各国教育发展的愿景,但儿童辍学问题却一直是全球历时性与共时性并存的教育发展难题。辍学对于儿童个体有持续的生态性影响,并会产生难以估量的社会溢出效应,因此,世界各国都将儿童辍学的防治列为推进教育质量和公平改革的重要议题。该研究通过文献梳理及实践剖析发现,辍学既包括“辍而未能返校”的永久性辍学、“虽辍却能返校”的阶段性辍学等事实问题,也包括“面临辍学危机”的边缘性辍学等隐性现象,辍学的影响因素可被归纳为自然、社会、社区、学校、家庭和儿童个体等六种类型,且儿童辍学问题行为的发生有着较为普遍的实践规律和表征,存在显著的群体差异、城乡差异、性别差异、年段差异及惯习差异。基于此,在乡村振兴背景下的控辍保学新阶段,为有效防范反复辍学、新增辍学与隐性辍学的发生,我国的控辍保学应重树观念、重识主体、重返实践、重构生态,着力构建以“儿童为中心”的多元主体“善意生态圈”,形成更具群体适用性的控辍保学实践策略,以期持续提升儿童辍学防治的长期成效,有力推动城乡义务教育的更公平普及和高质量发展。
Abstract:While universal and high-quality compulsory education is a vision of educational development in countries around the world, the problem of child dropout has always a difficult problem of educational development with a long history and coexistence in the world. Child dropout has a lasting ecological impact on children and produces immeasurable social spillover effects., all countries in the world have listed the prevention and control of child dropout as an important issue to promote the reform of the quality and equity of education. Based on literature review and analysis, this study finds that dropout includes not only the factual problems such as “dropout and failure to return to school” and “dropout but can return to school”, also the implicit phenomena such as “facing the crisis of dropout”. The influencing factors of dropout can be summarized into six types, namely, nature, society, community, school family and individual children. Moreover, the occurrence of the behavior of child dropout has relatively universal practice regularity and representation, and there are significant group differences, urban-rural differences, differences, age differences and habit differences. Based on this, in the new stage of controlling dropout and ensuring schooling under the background of rural revitalization, in order to effectively prevent the of repeated dropout, new dropout and implicit dropout, the control of dropout and ensuring schooling in China should reshape the concept, re-identify the main body, return to practice reconstruct the ecology, and strive to build a multisubject “good ecology circle” with “children as the center”, so as to form a more group-oriented control strategy dropout and ensuring schooling practice, in order to continuously improve the long-term effectiveness of the prevention and control of child dropout and effectively promote the more fair and high-quality popular and development of urban and rural compulsory education.
[1]新华社.中共中央国务院印发《教育强国建设规划纲要(2024-2035年)》[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202501/t20250119_1176193.html,2025-01-19.
[2]范先佐等.三尺书桌何处寻:流动人口子女教育困难与破解[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2011.35.
[3]王瑜,何苗苗.正义观视角下隐性辍学治理路径探究---基于法、美、日的经验[J].外国教育研究,2023,50(4):80-94.
[4]人民网.教育部:学生因贫失学、辍学已成为历史[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2022/54709/mtbd/202208/t20220830_656617.html,2022-08-30.
[5]赵明仁,陆春萍.从外控逻辑到内生逻辑:贫困地区义务教育控辍保学长效机制探究[J].教育研究,2020,41(10):73-81.
[6]封茵茵,欧贤才等.“后脱贫时代”中小学生辍学的原因及控辍保学工作展望[J].基础教育研究,2024,(7):1-4.
[7]教育部.教育部部署建立健全义务教育控辍保学常态化报告工作机制[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202404/t20240428_1127986.html,2024-04-28.
[8]李跃雪.初中生辍学行为的类型学研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2016.
[9]吴宏超,叶培等.农村学生上学距离对学校服务评价的影响---基于中西部4省区11县的实证研究[J].教育与经济,2023,39(6):31-38+59.
[10]谢爱磊.“读书无用”还是“读书无望”---对农村底层居民教育观念的再认识[J].北京大学教育评论,2017,15(3):92-108+190.
[11]吕国光.结构方程与中国农村儿童入学的决定因素[J].教育科学,2008,(1):68-74.
[12]李强.同伴效应对农村义务教育儿童辍学的影响[J].教育与经济,2019,(4):36-44.
[13]吴芝仪.危机边缘学生综合团体辅导方案之理论与实施[EB/OL].http://tosun.org.tw,2003-12-20.
[14]Susan Black.Keeping kids from dropping out[J].Education Digest,2003,68(1):37-41.
[15]刘彦尊.美国学生辍学问题研究[J].外国教育研究,2005,(9):65-70.
[16]Ou.S-R,Reynolds A J.Early Childhood Intervention and Educational Attainment:Age 22 findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study[J].Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk,2006,11(2):175-198.
[17]李强,叶昱利等.父母外出对农村留守儿童辍学的影响研究[J].农村经济,2020,(4):125-133.
[18]唐莎.农村初中生辍学风险的管理研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2023.
[19]李茜,尹可丽.辍学风险:关键年级、影响因素及其作用机制[J].社区心理学研究,2021,12(2):145-161.
[20]孟万金,刘在花等.推进残障儿童教育公平任重道远---四论残障儿童教育公平[J].中国特殊教育,2007,(2):3-8.
[21]钱昀,施慎逊等.学校恐惧症的研究进展[J].上海精神医学,2005,(2):112-114.
[22]张为伟.撤点并校政策、父母外出务工与我国农村地区儿童辍学[J].科学决策,2017,(5):79-94.
[23]Jacksonville Community Council,Inc.Why Youths Drop Out of School[EB/OL].http://www.jcci.org/studies/sc1988.pdf,2004-12-08.
[24]史耀波,赵欣欣.父母外出务工与寄宿制:哪个对农村学生辍学影响更大?---基于西部三省1881名初中生的实证分析[J].教育与经济,2016,(5):78-83+90.
[25]Frank,J.R..High School Dropout:A New Look at Family Variables[J].Social Work in Education,1990,13(1):34-47.
[26]国务院办公厅.关于进一步加强控辍保学提高义务教育巩固水平的通知[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2017-09/05/content_5222718.htm,2017-07-28.
[27]朱永新.用教育阻断贫困代际传递[J].同舟共进,2019,(11):30-32.
[28]Begu,E..Female School Dropout:Gender Differences in Students’School Ret[D].New York:Rochester Institute of Technology,2014.
[29]联合国教育、科学及文化组织.全民教育全球监测报告(巴黎)[EB/OL].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233557_eng,2015-07-29.
[30]张雪悦.“读书的料”为什么不读书?[D].上海:华东师范大学,2023.
[31]卫倩平.基于性别差异的教育公平[J].教育理论与实践,2010,30(32):9-11.
[32]Vera,E.M.,Polanin,J.R.,et al.Keeping Latina/o students in school:Factors related to academic intentions of students at risk for school dropout[J].Journal of Latina/o Psychology,2018,6:34-48.
[33]教育部.控辍保学一个都不能少---教育系统巩固提高义务教育入学率述评[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_2082/zl_2018n/2018_zl16/201803/t20180308_329195.html,2018-03-08.
[34]常宝宁.免费政策实施后儿童辍学问题实证研究---基于COX比例风险模型的分析[J].青年研究,2010,(6):39-45+95.
[35]蔡国英.我国辍学现象的经济学分析[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(2):36-41.
[36]Orpinas,P.,Raczynski,K.,et al.Latent profile analysis of sixth graders based on teacher ratings:Association with school dropout[J].School Psychology Quarterly,2015,30:577-592.
[37]闵文斌,常芳等.非经济因素对农村初中生辍学的影响[J].教育与经济,2016,(5):73-77.
[38]周潇.反学校文化与阶级再生产:“小子”与“子弟”之比较[J].社会,2011,31(5):70-92.
[39]王瑜,汤同.我国乡村地区辍学治理体系的历史演进、制度特征与优化对策[J].民族教育研究,2023,34(6):44-51.
[40]贾伟.新时代我国义务教育控辍保学的内在机理、现实困境及破解对策[J].教育与经济,2020,36(4):50-57.
[41]范国睿.教育生态学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2019.15.
[42]郭静晃.中途辍学青少年之现况分析及辅导[M].台北:洪叶文化事业有限公司,2001.17.
[43]贾伟,邓建中等.新时代我国实施义务教育控辍保学的内在价值、政策沿革及发展经验[J].教育与经济,2021,37(4):29-37.
[44]毛亚庆,鱼霞.如何理解社会情感学习[J].中国电化教育,2024,(1):16-22.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G521
引用信息:
[1]贾伟,毛亚庆,蔡其勇.何以学而不辍——儿童辍学问题的影响因素、群体表征及实践启示[J].中国电化教育,2025,No.462(07):123-130+141.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金“十四五”规划2022年度教育学一般课题“教育帮扶服务乡村振兴的长效机制与策略研究”(课题编号:BHA220108); 重庆市社会科学规划2023年度培育项目“乡村振兴背景下控辍保学教育生态系统重构研究”(项目编号:2023PY53)研究成果
2025-07-10
2025-07-10