nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2016, 10, No.357 31-38
教师信息技术使用的影响因素和调节效应的研究——基于UTAUT模型
基金项目(Foundation): 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金创新团队项目“信息化教学影响因素的模型建构研究”(项目编号:SWU1609148)、“新媒体思维下基础教育课程改革的全息摄像与路径创新研究”(项目编号:SWU1509382)”;; 西南大学教育学部特色领域创新团队项目“新媒体时代课堂教学改革与创新”(项目编号:2014CXTD09)研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2016-10-10
出版时间: 2016-10-10
网络发布时间: 2016-10-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

信息素养水平的高低直接影响到信息化教学的效能和效果,探索影响教师在教学中使用信息技术的因素是很有必要的。该文搜集了我国中东西9个省份和直辖市1423中小学教师的调查数据,以接受和使用技术的统一理论模型为基础,引入区域、城乡和校际差异三个调节变量,建构量化模型,探寻影响我国教师使用信息技术的因素及调节变量的调节效应。研究结果表明,UTAUT模型适用于我国国情,教师信息技术使用的努力期望、绩效期望、社群影响和便利条件对教师信息技术使用意愿和使用行为存在显著的积极影响。区域、城乡和校际差异调节作用显著,信息化发展落后地区(比如中西部、农村和非重点学校)所受的调节作用更加显著。该研究从国际视角论证了UTAUT模型的文化适应性,对我国学者应用国外相关研究成果奠定了一定的理论基础,同时为我国政府提出的需求性差异服务给予了可操作性建议。

Abstract:

Teachers' information literacy can directly affect their teaching efficiency and quality, so it is necessary to explore the factors that can influence teachers' use of technology in teaching. The study collected questionnaire response data of 1423 primary and secondary teachers from 9 provinces and municipalities in the west, middle and east area of China. The study utilized the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology(UTAUT) as a framework, and considered "regions of east, middle and west", "urban and rural areas", and "levels of schools" as moderators, trying to find out what factors and to what extend that the moderating effects the three moderators took. The result showed that the UTAUT model could be applied in the context of teachers' acceptance of technology in China. Teachers' effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions positively significantly influence teachers' use of technology in China. In addition, the three moderators played significant roles in these relationships, especially for the disadvantageous such as middle and west regions, rural area, and non-key schools. The study contributed the adaption of UTAUT model from cross-culture perspective, and provided theoretical foundation for Chinese scholars to utilize the related research finding originated from western culture. Further, the study provided practical suggestions for Chinese government to propose targeted services to teachers with different needs.

参考文献

[1][2][6][9]Venkatesh,V.,Morris,M.G.,Davis,G.B.,&Davis,F.D..User Acceptance of Information Technology:Toward a Unified View[J].MIS Quarterly Management Information Systems,2003,27(3):425-478.

[3]Anderson,J.E.,Schwager,P.H.,Kerns,R.L..The Drivers for Acceptance of Tablet PCs by Faculty in a College of Business[J].Journal of Information Systems Education,2006,17(4):429-440.

[4]Robinson,L.Moving beyond Adoption:Exploring the Determinants of Student Intention to Use Technology[J].Marketing Education Review,2006,16(2):79-88.

[5]Baron,S.,Patterson,A.,Harris,K..Beyond Technology Acceptance:Understanding Consumer Practice[J].International Journal of Service Industry Management,2006,17(2):111-135.

[7]Hennington A,Janz B D.Information Systems and Healthcare XVI:Physician Adoption of Electronic Medical Records:Applying the UTAUT Model in a Healthcare Context[J].Communications of the Association for Information Systems,2007,19(1):60-80.

[8]Garfield,M.J..Acceptance of Ubiquitous Computing[J].Information Systems Management,2005,22(4):24-31.

[10]王巧,刘清堂,李浩.基于用户需求的教育资源配置系统的研究与实现[J].中国电化教育,2009,(11):117-120.

[11]杨宗凯,熊才平,吴瑞华等.信息技术促进基础教育公共服务均等化研究前景预判[J].中国电化教育,2015,(1):70-76.

[12]闫英琪,景丽,郏伯荣,冯婕.甘肃省中小学教师信息技术能力培训现状分析及策略研究[J].河西学院学报,2010,(5):105-109.

[13]林万新.河北省农村中小学教育信息化发展状况的分析与思考[J].中国电化教育,2010,(3):43-46.

[14]林秀钦,黄荣怀.中小学教师信息技术应用的态度与行为调查[J].中国电化教育,2009,(9):17-22.

[15]Maldonado U P T,Khan G F,Moon J,et al..E-learning motivation,students’acceptance/use of educational portal in developing countries:a case study of Peru[A].Sohn S,eds.2009 Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology(ICCIT 2009)[C].California:IEEE,2009.1431-1441

[16]刘学涛.缩小教育信息化“不平衡”的实践与思考[J].中国电化教育,2009,(12):44-46.

[17]邓栩.长沙市小学计算机辅助教学现状调查与研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2004.

[18][24]Hair,J.F.,Christian,M.,Ringle,Marko,S..PLS-SEM:Indeed a Silver Bullet[J].Journal of Marketing Theory&Practice,2011,19(2):139-151.

[19][20]Henseler,J.,Ringle,C.M.,Sinkovics,R.R..The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2009,20(4):277-319.

[21]Magnusson,P.,Westjohn,S.A.,Semenov,A.V.,Randrianasolo,A.A.,&Zdravkovic,S..The Role of Cultural Intelligence in Marketing Adaptation and Export Performance[J].Journal of International Marketing,2013,21(4):44-61.

[22]Fornell,C.,Larcker,D.F..Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error[J].Journal of Marketing Research,1981,18(1):39-50.

[23]Montgomery,D.C.,Runger,G.C.,Hubele,N.F..Engineering statistics[J].Technical Reports,1999,46(2):347-348.

[25][27]Hair,J.F.,Ringle,C.M.,Hult,G.T.,Sarstedt,M..A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling(PLS-SEM)[M].Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,2013.

[26]Henseler,J.,Ringle,C.M.,Sarstedt,M..Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in Advertising Research:Basic Concepts and Recent Issues[DB/OL].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233408729_Using_Partial_Least_Squares_Path_Modeling_in_International_Advertising_Research_Basic_Concepts_and_Recent_Issues,2016-07-01.

[28]Snyder,P.,Lawson,S..Evaluating Results Using Corrected and Uncorrected Effect Size Estimates[J].Journal of Experimental Education,2014,61(4):334-349.

[29]Lipsey,M.W.,Wilson,D.B..Practical Meta-Analysis[M].Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,Inc,2001.

[30]Cohen,J..Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences[M].New York:Academic Press,1988.

[31]Roldán J L,Sánchez-Franco M J.Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling:Guidelines for Using Partial Least Squares[DB/OL].http://c.360webcache.com/c?m=174045cd79611c8c3b540d2b429c864a&q,2016-07-01.

[32][34]王香丽.基础教育阶段重点学校制度对我国教育公平的影响[J].教育评论,2010(6):3-6.

[33]刘万海,王䶮.中小学教师绩效评估的可行路径探析[J].现代中小学教育,2014,30(2):92-94.

[35]王香丽.我国高等教育入学机会的城乡差异研究——高中阶段教育的视角[J].高教探索,2011(1):55-59.

[36]樊明成.我国高等教育入学机会的城乡差异研究[J].教育科学,2008,24(1):63-67.

[37]许玲丽,周亚虹.义务教育资源配置对初中升学机会的影响[J].上海经济研究,2011,(12):25-35.

[38]孙颖.农村教师专业成长路径选择的影响因素探析——基于对五名小学教师的实地研究与思考[J].教育理论与实践,2012,(34):42-46.

[39]吕红军.农村小学教育信息化的实践探索——以淄博市北门里小学为例[J].中国电化教育,2009,(7):63-66.

[40]王香丽.基础教育阶段重点学校制度对我国教育公平的影响[J].教育评论,2010,(6):3-6

[41]郭绍青.《中小学教师信息技术应用能力培训课程标准(试行)》解读[J].电化教育研究,2015,(9):11-15.

[42]成江荣,解月光.农村中小学教育信息化绩效评估指标体系的构建[J].中国电化教育,2011,(2):47-52.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G434

引用信息:

[1]李毅,吴思睿,廖琴.教师信息技术使用的影响因素和调节效应的研究——基于UTAUT模型[J].中国电化教育,2016,No.357(10):31-38.

基金信息:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金创新团队项目“信息化教学影响因素的模型建构研究”(项目编号:SWU1609148)、“新媒体思维下基础教育课程改革的全息摄像与路径创新研究”(项目编号:SWU1509382)”;; 西南大学教育学部特色领域创新团队项目“新媒体时代课堂教学改革与创新”(项目编号:2014CXTD09)研究成果

发布时间:

2016-10-10

出版时间:

2016-10-10

网络发布时间:

2016-10-10

检 索 高级检索