| 5,349 | 73 | 267 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
“五育融合”课堂实践作为对“培养德智体美劳全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人”的教育方针的回应,是现代教育应对时代之变、关照教育主体、反思异化教育生态的新举措。“五育融合”理念体现了对自然的、生命的、整体的、共生的育人价值的追求。目前,“五育融合”课堂教学实践在实验区内已经初见成效,并形成了生成性“五育融合”课堂模式、“五育融合”教研共同体、基于学科的“五育融合”课堂等可迁移性经验。但“五育融合”课堂教学实践也遇到一些障碍,表现为“牵强附会”“纸上谈兵”“顾此失彼”等倾向。为不断接近“五育融合”课堂的“自然而然”之境的追求,特提出现阶段的突破路向:第一,破除“五育”的常识性窄化;第二,警惕“五育融合”的平均化用力;第三,创设真实情境带动“五育融合”。
Abstract:As a response to the educational policy of cultivating socialist builders and successors with the comprehensive development of of morality, intelligence, physical education, art, and labor, the practice of classroom teaching about the “Integration of Five Domains of Education” is a new measure for modern education to respond to changes in the era, to care for the subject of education, and to refect on the alienated ecology of education. The Theory of the “Integration of Five Domains of Education”in classroom teaching is the pursuit of natural, life, holistic, and symbiotic education values. Currently, the practice of classroom teaching about the “Integration of Five Domains of Education” has achieved initial results in the experimental area, and formed many transferable experiences such as the generative classroom model about the “Integration of Five Domains of Education”, the teaching and research community about the “Integration of Five Domains of Education”, and the subject-based classroom about the “Integration of Five Domains of Education”, etc. Nevertheless, some universal obstacles were also encountered in practice, such as the Forcibly Piece Together, Making Useless Comments without Solving Any Problem and Considering This and Losing the Other. In order to continuously approach the pursuit of the “natural” realm of the “Integration of Five Domains of Education”, the measures at the present stage are proposed: frstly, breaking the narrowing of the common sense of the “Five Domains of Education”; secondly, being wary of the over-averaged phenomenon of the “Integration of Five Domains of Education”; thirdly, creating a real situation to drive the “Integration of Five Domains of Education”.
[1]习近平.习近平在全国教育大会上强调坚持中国特色社会主义教育发展道路,培养德智体美劳全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201809/t20180910_348145.html,2018-09-10.
[2]中共中央,国务院.中国教育现代化2035[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201902/t20190223_370857.html,2019-02-23.
[3]中共中央,国务院.关于深化教育教学改革全面提高义务教育质量的意见[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201907/t20190708_389416.html,2019-06-23.
[4]斯宾塞.斯宾塞教育论著选[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2005.
[5][6]严复.严复集:诗文(上)[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[7]王国维.王国维文集(第3卷)[M].北京:中国文史出版社,1997.
[8]陈家顺.中国教育近代化中的“人的全面发展”:从三育到五育的嬗变[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(3):110-113.
[9]蔡元培.蔡元培文录[M].北京:商务印书馆,2019.
[10][11]杨贤江.杨贤江全集(第2卷)[M].开封:河南教育出版社,1995.
[12]肖朗,陈家顺.杨贤江的“全人生指导”思想--“人的全面发展”教育思想本土化的范例[J].教育研究,2006,(9):19-23.
[13]宁本涛.“五育融合”与中国基础教育生态重建[J].中国电化教育,2020,(5):1-5.
[14]李政涛,文娟.“五育融合”与新时代“教育新体系”的构建[J].中国电化教育,2020,(3):7-16.
[15]郝志军,刘晓荷.五育并举视域下的学校课程融合:理据、形态与方式[J].课程·教材·教法,2021,41(3):4-9+22.
[16][17]舒尔曼.实践智慧:论教学、学习与学会教学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2013.
[18]杜静媛,马云鹏等.“五育”并举进教材:价值意蕴、基本遵循及现实进路[J].现代教育管理,2021,(10):84-90.
[19]刘登珲,李华.“五育融合”的内涵、框架与实现[J].中国教育科学(中英文),2020,3(5):85-91.
[20]裴娣娜.教育创新与学校课堂教学改革论纲[J].课程·教材·教法,2012,32(2):3-9.
[21]叶澜.探教育之所“是”,创学校全面育人新生活--新时期“新基础教育”研究再出发[J].人民教育,2018,(Z2):10-16.
[22]教基[2017]8号,教育部关于印发《中小学德育工作指南》的通知[Z].
[23]魏善春.基于五育融合的课堂教学重构:样态、理念与实施[J].中国教育科学(中英文),2021,4(3):91-100.
[24]怀特海.教育的目的[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2002.
[25]鞠玉翠.基于真实情境问题的评价何以促进五育融合[J].中国电化教育,2021,(1):14-19.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G632.4
引用信息:
[1]王鑫,鞠玉翠.“五育融合”课堂教学实践:经验、障碍与路向[J].中国电化教育,2022,No.423(04):85-92.
2022-04-09
2022-04-09