nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 04, No.459 108-117
探究社区理论发展的知识图谱和研究趋势
基金项目(Foundation): 深圳市教育科学“十四五”规划2021年课题“慕课教学中批判性思维能力培养的理论与实践研究”(课题编号:ybzz21002)学术成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2025-04-02
出版时间: 2025-04-02
移动端阅读
摘要:

探究社区理论是在线与混合学习领域中具有深刻影响的国际学术成果,其核心贡献是为合作建构主义学习体验提供了一个连贯的框架和基础。研究采用文献计量法,结合大语言模型标注,对1992年至2024年间与探究社区理论相关的735篇文献进行了系统分析。结果显示,探究社区研究发展的知识图谱呈现为四个阶段:探索阶段(1992-2009)、稳定增长阶段(2010-2014)、震荡发展阶段(2015-2020)、爆发阶段(2021-2024)。研究梳理了该理论框架的起源、核心内容、各阶段的重要成果、研究的分歧,并着重对探究社区的研究趋势,即生成式人工智能能否作为高质量教育体验的构成要素存在?以及如何发挥其在批判性思维和合作能力培养方面的学术研究潜能?由此分析了探究社区理论对于积极面对新一代生成式人工智能带来的教育挑战的重要意义。

Abstract:

The Community of Inquiry(CoI) theory is an internationally influential academic achievement in the fields of online and blended learning, with its core contribution being providing a coherent framework and foundation for collaborative constructivist learning experiences.A systematic analysis was conducted on 735 literature related to exploring the CoI theory from 1992 to 2024 using bibliometric methods and large language model annotation. The findings reveal a four-stage knowledge evolution of CoI research: the exploratory stage(1992–2009),the stable growth stage(2010–2014), the fluctuating development stage(2015–2020), and the explosive growth stage(2021–2024).The study sorted out the origin, core content, important achievements in each stage, and research differences of the theoretical framework, and focused on exploring the research trend of the CoI, that is, whether generative artificial intelligence can exist as a constituent element of high-quality educational experience? And how to unleash its academic research potential in critical thinking and collaborative skills development? Thus,the significance of exploring the CoI theory in actively facing the educational challenges brought by the new generation of generative artificial intelligence was analyzed.

参考文献

[1][59]Stenbom S.A systematic review of the community of inquiry survey[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2018,39:22-32.

[2][69][70]Castellanos-Reyes D.20 years of the community of inquiry framework[J].Tech Trends,2020,64(4):557-560.

[3]Wilson E,Berge Z L.Educational experience and instructional design effectiveness within the community of inquiry framework[J].The International Review of Research in Open Distributed Learning,2023,24(1):159-174.

[4]Yu Z G,Li M.A bibliometric analysis of community of inquiry in online learning contexts over twenty-five years[J].Education and Information Tec hnologies,2022,27(8):11669-11688.

[5]Garrison R.Co I framework in face-to-face environments[EB/OL].https://www.the community of inquiry.org/editorial42,2024-09-15.

[6]Garrison R,Anderson T,Archer W.Critical inquiry in a text-based environment:Computer conferencing in Higher Education[J].The Internet and Higher Education,1999,2(2-3):87-105.

[7]Cleveland-Innes M,Garrison R,Stenbom S.The design of digital learning environments:online and blended applications of the community of inquiry[M].London:Routledge/Taylor and Francis,2024.

[8][17]世界慕课与在线教育联盟秘书处.挑战应对:携手共赢的未来--《无限的可能:世界高等教育数字化发展报告(2023)》节选三[J].中国教育信息化,2024,(1):42-45.

[9][18][75]钟秉林,尚俊杰等.Chat GPT对教育的挑战(笔谈)[J].重庆高教研究,2023,(3):3-25.

[10][19][77]Garrison R.Online learning and AI[EB/OL].https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial41,2024-09-15.

[11]Elsayad G.Can learning presence be the fourth community of inquiry presence?Examining the extended community of inquiry framework in blended learning using confirmatory factor analysis[J].Education and Information Technologies,2023,28(6):7291-7316.

[12][67]Anderson T.How communities of inquiry drive teaching and learning in the digital age[EB/OL].https://teachonline.ca/tools-trends/how-communities-inquiry-drive-teaching-and-learning-digitalage,2024-09-15.

[13]兰国帅,钟秋菊等.学习存在感与探究社区模型关系研究[J].开放教育研究,2018,(5):92-107.

[14]Garrison R.Cognitive presence update[EB/OL].https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial39,2024-09-15.

[15]Dindar M,J?rvel?S,J?rvenoja H.Interplay of metacognitive experiences and performance in collaborative problem solving[J].Computers&Education,2020,154:103922.

[16]Garrison R.Shared metacognition in a community of inquiry[J].Online learning,2022,26(1):6-18.

[20]Anderson T,Garrison D R.Transactional issues in distance education:The impact of design in audiotele conferencing[J].American Journal of Distance Education,1995,9(2):27-45.

[21]Bozkurt A.Intellectual roots of distance education:A progressive knowledge domain analysis[J].Distance Education,2019,40(4):497-514.

[22]Garrison R.Self-directed learning:toward a comprehensive model[EB/OL].https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103,2024-09-15.

[23]Garrison R.Critical thinking and social media:An Argument for learning communities[EB/OL].https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial10,2024-09-15.

[24]Kozan K,Caskurlu S.On the nth presence for the community of inquiry framework[J].Computers&Education,2018,122:104-118.

[25]Garrison R.Assement of Co I revisions[EB/OL].https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial12,2024-09-15.

[26]Garrison R.Cognitive Presence update[EB/OL].https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial5,2024-09-15.

[27]Breivik J.Critical thinking in online educational discussions measured as progress through inquiry phases:A discussion of the cognitive presence construct in the community of inquiry framework[J].International journal of e-learning&distance education,2016,31(1):1-16.

[28]Garrison R.Thinking collaboratively:Learning in a community of inquiry[M].London:Routledge/Taylor and Francis,2016.

[29][36][40]Garrison R.E-Learning in the 21st century:A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd edition)[M].London:Routledge/Taylor and Francis,2017.

[30]Sp E,Sholeh M,Hermanto F.How inquiry learning model affects students’learning results and critical thinking skills in covid-19 pandemic?[J].Dinamika Pendidikan,2021,16(2):113-123.

[31]Borup J,Graham C R,et al.Academic communities of engagement:An expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning[EB/OL].https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x,2024-09-15.

[32]Zongozzi J N.A concept analysis of theory in South African open distance and e-learning research[J].Open Learning:The Journal of Open,Distance and e-Learning,2021,36(2):149-163.

[33]Garrison R,Anderson T,Archer W.Critical thinking,cognitive presence,and computer conferencing in distance education[J].American Journal of Distance Education,2001,15(1):7-23.

[34]Anderson T,Rourke L,Garrison R,et al.Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context[J].Online learning (Newburyport,Ma ss.),2001,5(2):1-17.

[35]Rourke L,Anderson T,Garrison R,et al.Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing[J].Journal of Distance Education,2001,14(2):50-71.

[37]Law K M Y,Geng S,Li T.Student enrollment,motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment:The mediating effects of social,teaching,and cognitive presence[J].Computers&Education,2019,136:1-12.

[38]Garrison R.Online community of inquiry review:Social,cognitive,and teaching presence issues[J].Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,2007,11(1):61-72.

[39]Online conversation between Audrey and Garrison.October 2023[EB/OL].https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/community,2024-09-15.

[41]Tirado Morueta R,Maraver López P,Hernando Gómezá,et al.Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2016,31:122-131.

[42]Zydney J M,Denoyelles A,Kyeong-Ju Seo K.Creating a community of inquiry in online environments:An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions[J].Computers&Education,2012,58(1):77-87.

[43]Heilporn G,Lakhal S.Investigating the reliability and validity of the community of inquiry framework:An analysis of categories within each presence[J].Computers&Education.2020,145:103712.

[44]Zhang R.Exploring blended learning experiences through the community of inquiry framework[J].Language learning&technology,2020,24(1):38-53.

[45]Akyol Z,Garrison R.The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course:Understanding the progression and integration of social,cognitive and teaching presence[J].Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,2008,12(3):3-22.

[46]Archibald D.Fostering the development of cognitive presence:initial findings using the community of inquiry survey instrument[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2010,13(1):73-74.

[47]Kozan K,Richardson J C.Interrelationships between and among social,teaching,and cognitive presence[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2014,21:68-73.

[48]Garrison R,Cleveland-Innes M,Fung T S.Exploring causal relationships among teaching,cognitive and social presence:student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2010,13(1):31-36.

[49]Ke F.Examining online teaching,cognitive,and social presence for adult students[J].Computers&Education,2010,55(2):808-820.

[50]白雪梅,马红亮等.教学存在、社会存在及认知存在关系研究--以基于MOOC的混合课程为例[J].开放教育研究,2016,(4):71-78.

[51]白雪梅,马红亮等.探究社区中社会存在对认知存在的影响机制[J].现代远程教育研究,2020,(6):87-93.

[52]Boston W,Diaz S R,Gibson A M,et al.An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs[J].Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,2010,13(3):67-83.

[53]Traver A E,Volchok E,Bidjerano T,et al.Correlating community college students’perceptions of community of inquiry presences with their completion of blended courses[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2014,20(1):1-9.

[54][62]Akyol Z,Garrison R,Ozden M Y.Online and blended communities of inquiry:Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences[J].The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,2009,10(6):65-83.

[55]Chen C.Science mapping:A systematic review of the literature[J].Journal of Data and Information Science,2017,2(2):1-40.

[56]Saw K,Majid O,Ghani N,et al.The videoconferencing learning environ ment:Technology,interaction and learning intersect[J].British Journal of Educational Technology,2008,39(3):475-485.

[57]Arnold N,Ducate L.Future foreign language teachers’social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment[J].Language learning&technology,2006,10(1):42-66.

[58][74]Arbaugh J B,Cleveland-Innes M,Diaz S R,et al.Developing a community of inquiry instrument:Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2008,11(3):133-136.

[60]Garrison R,Anderson T,Archer W.The first decade of the community of inquiry framework:A retrospective[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2010,13(1):5-9.

[61]Ozturk E.Facebook as a new community of inquiry environment:an investigation in terms of academic achievement and motivation[J].Journal of Baltic Science Education,2015,14(1):20-33.

[63]Shea P,Bidjerano T.Understanding distinctions in learning in hybrid,and online environments:An empirical investigation of the community of inquiry framework[J].Interactive Learning Environments,2013,21(4):355-370.

[64]Kucuk S,Sahin I.From the perspective of community of inquiry framework:An examination of facebook uses by pre-service teachers as a learning environment[J].Turkish online journal of educational technology,2013,12(2):142-156.

[65]Watson S L,Watson W R,Richardson J,et al.Instructor’s use of social presence,teaching presence,and attitudinal dissonance:a case study of an attitudinal change mooc[J].International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,2016,17(3):54-74.

[66]Shea P,Bidjerano T.Learning presence:Towards a theory of selfefficacy,self-regulation,and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments[J].Computers&Education,2010,55(4):1721-1731.

[68]兰国帅,钟秋菊等.自我效能、自我调节学习与探究社区模型的关系研究--基于网络学习空间中开展的混合教学实践[J].中国电化教育,2020,(12):44-54.

[71]Fiock H.Designing a community of inquiry in online courses[J].The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,2020,21(1):135-153.

[72]Wilkinson K L.Evaluating a structured online peer evaluation system among graduate-level communication capstone students through action research[J].Online learning,2022,26(1):93-129.

[73]Zou J,Zhang S.Using student feedback to analyze the characteristics of presence in classroom settings based on the community of inquiry framework[J].Sustainability,2022,14(10):6103.

[76][79][80]Bozkurt A,Sharma R C.Challenging the status quo and exploring the new boundaries in the age of algorithms:Reimagining the role of generative ai in distance education and online learning[J].Asian Journal of Distance Education,2023,18(1):i-iii.

[78]Lee J,Soleimani F,et al.Predicting cognitive presence in at-scale online learning:MOOC and for-credit online course environments[EB/OL].https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3060,2024-09-15.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G434;G353.1

引用信息:

[1]李文光,贾维辰.探究社区理论发展的知识图谱和研究趋势[J].中国电化教育,2025,No.459(04):108-117.

基金信息:

深圳市教育科学“十四五”规划2021年课题“慕课教学中批判性思维能力培养的理论与实践研究”(课题编号:ybzz21002)学术成果

发布时间:

2025-04-02

出版时间:

2025-04-02

检 索 高级检索