| 703 | 27 | 117 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
该研究在对青少年信息搜索策略的研究成果梳理基础上,探讨了内隐策略与外显策略对网络学习绩效的影响,提出了引导学生正确查找网络资源的方法。该实证研究发现:内隐策略与外显策略的相关性因子较少,二者是相互独立的;内隐策略的"选择主要观点"因子与融合性指标有显著正相关性,"评价因子"与健全性和总绩效有显著正相关性;外显策略的"浏览结果时间、略读时间因子"与搜索结果存在显著负相关性,"采用网页数目和精读时间因子"与搜索结果存在显著正相关;多元回归分析结果表明,精读时间和评价是显著预测搜索结果的健全性、总绩效的变量,精读时间和采用网页数目是显著预测丰富性和融合性的变量。
Abstract：Based on the adolescents' information searching strategies research review, the study discusses implicit and explicit strategies impacting on web-based learning performance, and proposes the methods of guiding students to find information resources. The empirical study shows that implicit and explicit strategies are independent of each other, since few factors are correlated with statistical significance. Selecting main ideas factor of implicit strategies has significantly positive correlations with the Integration indicator, and Evaluation factor has significantly positive correlations with the outcomes of soundness and total performance. Explicit strategies' browsing results time and skimming time factors have significantly negative correlations with the searching outcomes. Number of adopting web pages and detailed reading time factors have significantly positive correlations with the searching outcomes. Multiple regression analysis results show that detailed reading time and evaluation factors can significantly explain the outcomes of soundness and total performance, detailed reading time and number of adopting web pages factors can significantly predict the outcome of abundance and integration. 5 tabs. 21 refs.
[1]Chung J S,Neuman D.High school students'information seeking and use for class projects[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2007,58(10):1503-1517.
[2]Smith M,Hepworth M.An investigation of factors that may demotivate secondary school students undertaking project work Implications for learning information literacy[J].Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,2007,39(1):3-15.
[3]黄国祯,郭凡瑞,蔡新德.概念构图教学策略对国小学童线上资料搜寻能力及知识结构的影响—以自然课程为例[J].科学教育学刊,2009,17(5):367-385.
[4]Walraven A,Brand-Gruwel S,Boshuizen H.How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information[J].Computers&Education,2009,52(1):234-246.
[5]Bilal D.Children’s use of the Yahooligans!Web search engine:I.Cognitive,physical,and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,2000,51(7):646-665.
[6][13][14][15]Tsai M J.Online information searching strategy inventory(OISSI):a quick version and a complete version[J].Computers&Education,2009,53(2):473-483.
[7][22]Tabatabai D,Shore B.How experts and novices search the web[J].Library&Information Science Research,2005,27(2):222-248.
[8]Yang F Y,Chen Y H,Tsai M J.How University Students Evaluate Online Information about a Socio-scientific Issue and the Relationship with their Epistemic Beliefs[J].Journal of Educational Technology&Society,2013,16(3):385-399.
[9]Dimopoulos K,Asimakopoulos A.Science on the web:secondary school students’navigation patterns and preferred pages’characteristics[J].Journal of Science Education and Technology,2010,19(3):246-265.
[10]She H C,Cheng M T,Li T W,et al.Web-based undergraduate chemistry problem-solving:The interplay of task performance,domain knowledge and web-searching strategies[J].Computers&Education,2012,59(2):750-761.
[11]Hwang G J,Tsai P S,Tsai C C,et al.A novel approach for assisting teachers in analyzing student web-searching behaviors[J].Computers&Education,2008,51(2):926-938.
[12]Tsai M J,Tsai C C.Information searching strategies in web-based science learning:The role of Internet self-efficacy[J].Innovations in Education and Teaching International,2003,40(1):43-50.
[16]Tu Y W,Shih M,Tsai C C.Eighth graders’web searching strategies and outcomes:The role of task types,web experiences and epistemological beliefs[J].Computers&Education,2008,51(3):1142-1153.
[17][20]Tsai M J,Hsu C Y,Tsai C C.Investigation of high school students’online science information searching performance:the role of implicit and explicit strategies[J].Journal of Science Education and Technology,2012,21(2):246-254.
[18]Sweller J,Van Merrienboer J J G,Paas F G W C.Cognitive architecture and instructional design[J].Educational Psychology Review,1998,10(3):251-296.
[19]Gredler M E.Learning and instruction:Theory into practice[M].Upper Saddle River,NJ:Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall,2005.
[21]Lin C C,Tsai C C.Exploring the structural relationships between high school students’scientific epistemological views and their utilization of information commitments toward online science information[J].International Journal of Science Education,2008,30(15):2001-2022.
[23]Brand-Gruwel S,Wopereis I,Vermetten Y.Information problem solving by experts and novices:Analysis of a complex cognitive skill[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2005,21(3):487-508.
[24]Wopereis I,Brand-Gruwel S,Vermetten Y.The effect of embedded instruction on solving information problems[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2008,24(3):738-752.
[25]刘亚.将青少年纳入信息贫困研究视野:来自青少年信息行为研究的证据[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(7):12-20.
[26]Butler K A,Lumpe A.Student use of scaffolding software:relationships with motivation and conceptual understanding[J].Journal of Science Education and Technology,2008,17(5):427-436.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G434
引用信息:
[1]谭金波.学生信息搜索的内隐与外显策略对网络学习绩效的影响[J].中国电化教育,2014,No.332(09):67-71+77.
基金信息:
全国教育科学规划教育部青年课题“学习者网络信息搜索的行为特征及其策略建构研究”(课题编号:ECA130376)的研究成果之一
2014-09-10
2014-09-10