| 8,630 | 1 | 328 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
生成式人工智能(GAI)与传统教育教学过程的深度融合正成为教学改革重点方向。研究基于输出假设和过程写作两个反馈理论，集中探究了GAI反馈对中学生英语写作表现的影响。通过对比实验组和对照组在四次作文评分中的得分情况，分析GAI反馈与教师反馈对中学生写作内容切题性、语法正确性、词句准确性和表达逻辑性的影响。研究结果表明，GAI反馈能够提升中学生的英语写作表现，写作基础整体一般学生的写作内容切题性、语法正确性、词句准确性和表达逻辑性均有提升，但写作基础整体较好学生的写作切题性提升有限。研究揭示了生成式人工智能反馈在中学生英语写作教学中的有效性，可为语言教学数字化转型提供参考依据。
Abstract：The deep integration of artificial intelligence generated content(GAI) with traditional education and teaching process is becoming a key direction of teaching reform. Based on two feedback theories, output hypothesis and process writing, the study focused on the effect of GAI feedback on secondary school students' English writing performance. By comparing the scores of the experimental group and the control group in four essay scores, the effects of GAI feedback and teacher feedback on the content relevance, grammatical correctness, word accuracy and expression logic of secondary school students' writing were analyzed. The results of the study show that GAI feedback enhances secondary school students' English writing performance, and that students with an overall average writing foundation have an increase in tangentiality, grammatical correctness, lexical accuracy, and expressive logic of their writing, but students with an overall better writing foundation have a limited increase in tangentiality of their writing. The study reveals the effectiveness of generative AI feedback in teaching English writing to secondary school students, which can provide a reference basis for the digital transformation of language teaching.
[1]李佐文.Chat GPT赋能外语教学:场景与策略[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2024,46(1):109-118.
[2]吴坚豪,周婉婷等.生成式人工智能技术赋能口语教学的实证研究[J].中国电化教育,2024(4):105-111.
[3]郭茜,冯瑞玲等.Chat GPT在英语学术论文写作与教学中的应用及潜在问题[J].外语电化教学,2023,(2):18-23+107.
[4]王律,王湘玲.Chat GPT时代机器翻译译后编辑能力培养模式研究[J].外语电化教学,2023,(4):16-23+115.
[5]刘静,王光明.过程性评价对学生学业成绩影响研究--基于63项实证研究的元分析[J].中国考试,2024,(1):72-82.
[6]杨正来.高中薄弱学生英语作文有效指导策略研究[J].教育科学论坛,2016,(4):62-65.
[7]Tseng Y-C,Lin Y-H.Enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL)Learners’Writing with Chat GPT:A University-Level Course Design[J].Electronic Journal of e-Learning,2024,22(2):78-97.
[8]苏艳花.信息技术环境下初中英语口语教学的策略研究[J].甘肃教育研究,2024,(15):107-109.
[9]焦建利,陈婷.大型语言模型赋能英语教学:四个场景[J].外语电化教学,2023,(2):12-17+106.
[10]陈新仁.Chat GPT与二语语用教学[J].外语教学理论与实践,2024,(4):16-29.
[11]魏爽,李璐遥.人工智能辅助二语写作反馈研究--以Chat GPT为例[J].中国外语,2023,20(3):33-40.
[12]杨颖莉,高子涵.学习者个体差异因素对二语写作表现影响的追踪研究[J].外语教学与研究,2024,56(1):113-124+161.
[13]Hyland K,Hyland F.Feedback on second language students’writing[J].Language teaching,2006,39(2):83-101.
[14]Swain M.Three functions of output in second language learning[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995.125-144.
[15]李金红.国外主流写作理论对我国外语写作教学的启示[J].国外外语教学,2006,(2):41-46.
[16]Zeevy-Solovey O.Comparing peer,Chat GPT,and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing:Students’perceptions and preferences[J].Technology in Language Teaching&Learning,2024,6(3):82-104.
[17]毛延生,王一航,邢艳茹.Chat GPT辅助高中英语写作反馈的实证研究[J].教育测量与评价,2024,(1):3-13.
[18]武蕊.对英语写作教学中教师反馈和在线反馈方式的态度研究[J].海外英语,2023,(23):115-117.
[19]Zhou T,Cao S,et al.Chinese intermediate English learners outdid Chat GPT in deep cohesion:Evidence from English narrative writing[J].System,2023,118:103-141.
[20]Liu G,Ma C.Measuring EFL learners’use of Chat GPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model[J].Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching,2024,18(2):125-138.
[21]Harunasari S Y.Examining the effectiveness of AI-integrated approach in EFL writing:A case of Chat GPT[J].International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technology (IJPSAT),2023,39(2):357-368.
[22]Casanave C P.Writing in foreign language contexts:Learning,teaching,and research[M].Bristol:Blue Ridge Summit,2009.256-277.
[23]Sha G.AI-based chatterbots and spoken English teaching:a critical analysis[J].Computer Assisted Language Learning,2009,22(3):269-281.
[24]杨华利,郭盈等.人机协同支持下的小学英语写作教学研究[J].现代教育技术,2020,30(4):74-80.
[25]刘应亮,刘胜蓝等.社会文化活动理论视域下人机协同教学及应用探索--以i Write协同英语写作教学为例[J].中国电化教育,2022,(11):108-116.
[26]Swain M.The output hypothesis:Just speaking and writing aren’t enough[J].Canadian modern language review,1993,50(1):158-164.
[27]唐锦兰.探究写作自动评价系统在英语教学中的应用模式[J].外语教学理论与实践,2014,(1):49-57+94.
[28][30]杨永林，罗立胜等.一种基于数字化教学理念的写作训练系统[J].外语电化教学,2004,(4):4-10+16.
[29]Bayat N.The Effect of the Process Writing Approach on Writing Success and Anxiety[J].Educational Sciences:Theory and Practice,2014,14(3):1133-1141.
[31]林凯.浅谈初中生英语写作中存在的问题及其对策[J].科技信息,2013,(3):253+257.
[32]王静文.初中学生在英语写作中所存在的问题及其对策[J].科学大众(科学教育),2017(5):75-76.
[33]文秋芳.“作文内容”的构念效度研究--运用结构方程模型软件AMOS 5的尝试[J].外语研究,2007,(3):66-71+112.
[34]滕琳,杨玉鑫等.国际二语自我调节学习研究二十年回顾:基于文献计量与范围综述的融通方法[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,54(4):145-159.
[35]张亚,姜占好.人机混合反馈环境对学习投入和二语写作水平的影响研究[J].外语界,2022,(4):40-48.
[36]Truscott J.The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes[J].Language learning,1996,46(2):327-369.
[37]Deng J,Lin Y.The Benefits and Challenges of Chat GPT:An Overview[J].Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems,2023,2(2):81-83.
[38]任伟,刘远博等.英语写作教学中Chat GPT与教师反馈的对比研究[J].外语教学理论与实践,2024(4):30-38+60.
[39]刘荣君,张虹等.信息技术支持的大学生英语写作能力培养的实证研究[J].电化教育研究,2014,35(5):82-86+113.
[40]潘璠，冯跃进.非英语专业研究生写作中连接词用法的语料库调查[J].现代外语,2004,(2):157-162+217-218.
[41]李久亮,郭平建.浅谈大学生英语作文中的逻辑连接错误[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2013,40(S1):153-156.
[42]李锐,倪传斌等.学生使用在线作文自动评价系统影响因素的比较研究[J].电化教育研究,2015,36(11):64-68.
[43]何旭良.句酷批改网英语作文评分的信度和效度研究[J].现代教育技术,2013,23(5):64-67.
[44]蒋艳,马武林.中国英语写作教学智能导师系统:成就与挑战--以句酷批改网为例[J].电化教育研究,2013,34(7):76-81.
[45]Bibi Z,Atta A.The role of Chat GPT as AI English writing assistant:A study of student’s perceptions,experiences,and satisfaction[J].Annals of Human and Social Sciences,2024,5(1):433.
基本信息:
DOI：
中图分类号:G434;G633.41
引用信息:
[1]刘梦君,邹文龙,宗敏等.生成式人工智能何以赋能教学——中学生英语写作教学实证研究[J].中国电化教育,2025,No.461(06):70-79.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目“新高考综合素质评价数据安全管理机制研究：区块链技术赋能视角”(项目编号：72204077)资助