nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2020, 06, No.401 88-94+129
智慧教室环境下协作学习的异常行为特征分析
基金项目(Foundation): 2019年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划青年课题“智慧学习环境下基于知识建模图的学习资源整合及其应用研究”(课题编号:19NDQN374YB);; 2019年浙江省教育厅一般课题“智慧教室中智能技术产品功能的教学适应性研究”(课题编号:KYZ04Y19282)阶段性成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2020-06-10
出版时间: 2020-06-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

在智慧教室教学实践不丰富的情况下,如何在智慧教室中开展常态化教学是一个亟待解决的问题,而智慧教室中常态化教学的开展需充分了解该环境下教学真相。异常教学行为是反映教学真相的一个方面,异常教学行为的消除对增加教学的确定性、获得良好的预期教学效果具有很大帮助,然而目前却少有人涉及异常教学行为方面的研究。为此,文章选择以协作学习为切入口,通过对比常规教室与智慧教室下协作学习的异常行为特征来积累消除异常教学行为的经验。通过对比分析发现:媒体技术的使用对协作学习的异常行为分布结构影响较小,并不能像期望的那样能有效减少协作学习中的异常行为,协作学习中异常行为的消除主要依赖协作学习活动的设计,而研究介入异常随实验持续逐渐减少,但无法完全消除。因此,面对智慧教室中的智能化技术产品,我们应首先关注它的实际教学功能,然后考虑如何根据实际教学需要选择恰当的智能产品,让智能技术为教学赋能,以减少异常教学行为的发生,而不是为技术所累,为所谓的"智慧好课堂"表演而去刻意使用一些智能技术产品来哗众取宠。

Abstract:

It is an urgent problem that how to carry on the normal instruction in the smart classroom when the instruction practice is not abundant. Normal instruction in the smart classroom needs to fully understand the truth of instruction in this environment. The abnormal instruction behavior is one of the aspects that reflect the truth of instruction. The elimination of abnormal instruction behavior is of great help to increase the certainty of instruction and obtain good expected teaching results. However, there are few researches on abnormal instruction behavior. Therefore, this paper chooses collaborative learning as the entry point and accumulates the experience of eliminating abnormal instruction behaviors by comparing the abnormal behavior characteristics of collaborative learning in conventional classrooms and smart classrooms. It is found that the use of media technology in smart classroom has little influence on the distribution structure of abnormal collaborative learning behaviors, and it cannot effectively reduce abnormal collaborative learning behaviors as expected. The elimination of abnormal collaborative learning behaviors in mainly depends on the design of collaborative learning activities. However, the study interventional abnormalities gradually decrease with the experiment, but cannot be completely eliminated. Therefore, facing the intelligent technology products in smart classroom, we should first focus on its practical instruction function, and then consider to select appropriate intelligent products according to the instruction needs, so that the intelligent technology can truly empower instruction, so as to eliminate abnormal instruction behaviors, and not for technology, for the so-called "smart good class" performance to deliberately grandstanding by using some intelligent technology products.

参考文献

[1]张亚珍,张宝辉等.国内外智慧教室研究评论及展望[J].开放教育研究,2014,(1):81-91.

[2]郑兰琴.基于信息流的面对面协作学习交互分析研究[D].北京:北京师范大学,2012.

[3]Kapur M,Voiklis J,Kinzer C K.Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning(CSCL)groups[J].Computers&Education,2008,51(1):54-66.

[4]Newman D,Johnson C,Webb B,et al.Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1997,48(6):484-495.

[5]Jeong H,Chi M T H.Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning[J].Instructional Science,2006,35(4):287-315.

[6]Fuchs L,Fuchs D,Kazdan S,et al.Effects of workgroup structure and size on student productivity during collaborative work on complex tasks[J].Elementary School Journal,2000,(100):183-212.

[7]Schellens T,Valcke M.Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups[J].Computers&Education,2006,(46):349-370.

[8]Ding N,Bosker R J,Harskamp E G.Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computersupported collaborative learning[J].Computers&Education,2011,56(2):325-336.

[9]De Wever B,Van Keer H,Schellens T,et al.Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data:Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups[J].Learning and Instruction,2007,17(4):436-447.

[10]Kirschner P A,Sweller J,Clark R E.Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work:An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist,Discovery,Problem-Based,Experiential,and InquiryBased Teaching[J].Educational Psychologist,2006,41(2):75-86.

[11]Harrer A.Interaction Analysis at Coordination Level with Semistructured Interfaces[C].Berlin Germany,Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence,August 20-25,2000.

[12]Huei-Tse Hou S W.Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool:A case study[J].Computers&Education,2011,57(2):1459-1468.

[13]Francisca Capponi M,Nussbaum M,Marshall G,et al.Pattern Discovery for the Design of Face-to-Face Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Activities[J].Educational Technology&Society,2010,13(2):40-52.

[14][16][22]何文涛,杨开城等.智慧教室环境下协作学习的行为构成及其特征分析[J].电化教育研究,2017,(11):87-95.

[15]杨开城.教育学的坏理论研究之一:教育学的核心概念体系[J].现代远程教育研究,2013,(5):11-18.

[17]何文涛,杨开城等.智慧教室的媒体产品功能在协作学习中的适用性研究[J].中国电化教育,2018,(2):73-83.

[18]杨平展,刘娟文等.关于教学行为分类系统VICS的讨论[J].教师,2009,(6):3-4.

[19]方海光,高辰柱等.改进型弗兰德斯互动分析系统及其应用[J].中国电化教育,2012,(10):109-113.

[20]顾小清,王炜.支持教师专业发展的课堂分析技术新探索[J].中国电化教育,2004,(7):18-21.

[21]金建峰,顾小清.信息技术环境下课堂教学行为的分析研究[J].中国电化教育,2010,(9):82-86.

[23]杨开城,何文涛等.基于信息流分析的媒体技术教学应用的研究理路[J].中国电化教育,2016,(5):6-10+37.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G434

引用信息:

[1]何文涛,王良辉,朱玲林,等.智慧教室环境下协作学习的异常行为特征分析[J].中国电化教育,2020,No.401(06):88-94+129.

基金信息:

2019年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划青年课题“智慧学习环境下基于知识建模图的学习资源整合及其应用研究”(课题编号:19NDQN374YB);; 2019年浙江省教育厅一般课题“智慧教室中智能技术产品功能的教学适应性研究”(课题编号:KYZ04Y19282)阶段性成果

发布时间:

2020-06-10

出版时间:

2020-06-10

检 索 高级检索