| 257 | 0 | 133 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
智慧教育逐渐成为各国探索未来教育形态和推进教育变革的重要方向。为揭示不同国家智慧教育发展的阶段性差异与路径特征,该研究以“国家智慧教育框架”为理论参照,聚焦智慧教育的国际理解与发展现状,综合运用问卷调查、公共数据分析与半结构化访谈方法,对中国与东南亚国家智慧教育发展进行比较研究。研究发现:第一,不同国家智慧教育发展处在教育变革的不同阶段,包括一阶变革、二阶变革,抑或起始时的“局部创新”阶段;第二,各国对智慧教育的理解整体呈现技术赋能与核心素养培养并重的共识取向;第三,智慧教育发展的现实挑战主要包括政策协同不强、教师能力建设滞后和本土化适配不足等方面。研究认为,我国智慧教育深化发展应从系统建设走向薄弱环节补强,从数字技能培训走向人机协同教学能力发展,并在国际合作中从经验输出走向共同能力建设,以提升智慧教育发展的均衡性和区域合作适配性。
Abstract:Smart education has gradually become an important direction for countries to explore future forms of education and advance educational transformation. To reveal the stage-specific differences and pathway characteristics of smart education development across countries, this study takes the National Smart Education Framework as its theoretical reference and focuses on the international understanding and current development of smart education. By integrating questionnaire surveys, public data analysis, and semi-structured interviews, the study conducts a comparative analysis of smart education development in China and Southeast Asian countries. The findings show that: first, countries are at different stages of educational transformation in developing smart education, including first-order change, second-order change, or the initial stage of “ localized innovation”; second, countries' understandings of smart education generally reflect a shared orientation that emphasizes both technology empowerment and the cultivation of core competencies; third, the practical challenges facing smart education development mainly include insufficient policy coordination, lagging teacher capacity building, and inadequate local adaptation. The study argues that the further development of smart education in China should shift from system-wide construction to strengthening weak links, from digital skills training to the development of human-AI collaborative teaching competencies, and, in international cooperation, from experience sharing to joint capacity building, so as to enhance the balanced development of smart education and improve the contextual adaptability of regional cooperation.
[1]黄荣怀,刘嘉豪等.面向智能时代的教育系统性变革:数字化赋能教育综合改革[J].电化教育研究,2025,46(4):5-12.
[2]沈方玖,张清璨等.教育数字化转型:缘起、内容与途径[J].教育与装备研究,2026,(2):76-80.
[3]欧媚.教育部发布《中国智慧教育白皮书》[J].复旦教育论坛,2025,23(4):2.
[4]黄荣怀,刘梦彧等.智慧教育之“为何”与“何为”——关于智能时代教育的表现性与建构性特征分析[J].电化教育研究,2023,44(1):5-12+35.
[5]UNESCO IITE,Beijing Normal University,International Society for Technology in Education.Report on National Smart Education Framework[M].Moscow:UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education,2022.
[6][美]约翰·W.克雷斯维尔.李敏谊译.混合方法研究导论[M].上海:格致出版社,2015.39-109.
[7]冯婷婷,刘德建等.数字教育:应用、共享、创新——2024世界数字教育大会综述[J].中国电化教育,2024,(3):20-36.
[8]Huang R,Liu D,et al.Global understanding of smart education in the context of digital transformation[J].Open Praxis,2024,16(4):663-676.
[9]Murtagh F,Legendre P.Ward’ s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method:which algorithms implement Ward’ s criterion?[J].Journal of Classification,2014,31(3):274-295.
[10]Watzlawick P,Weakland H,et al.Change:Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution[M].New York:W.W.Norton&Company,1974.
[11]Bartunek J M,Moch M K.First-order,second-order,and third-order change and organization development interventions:A cognitive approach[J].The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,1987,23(4):483-500.
[12]李永智,安德烈亚斯·施莱歇尔.人工智能时代的能力重构与教育变革:全球趋势探析[J].全球教育展望,2025,54(9):3-19.
[13]褚宏启.核心素养的国际视野与中国立场——21世纪中国的国民素质提升与教育目标转型[J].教育研究,2016,37(11):8-18.
[14]黄荣怀.人工智能大模型融入教育:观念转变、形态重塑与关键举措[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2024,(14):23-30.
[15]凌鹊,刘景华.迈向数字共同体:东盟教育数字化转型的动因、政策与实践[J].比较教育研究,2025,47(10):62-72.
[16]王名扬,秦惠民等.高等教育数字化转型的“东盟方式”研究——以印度尼西亚为例[J].教育发展研究,2025,45(3):19-25.
[17]洪化清,刘淑淇.AI时代中学教师数字能力建设的“新加坡经验”及其启示[J].教学月刊·中学版(教学管理),2025,(11):11-19.
[18]Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Dokumen Penuh Rancangan Pendidikan Malaysia(RPM)2026—2035[M]. Putrajaya:Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia,2026.
[19]Department of Education.Quality Basic Education Development Plan 2025-2035[M].Manila:Department of Education,2025.
[20]刘梦彧,潘静文等.中国参与全球数字教育治理的策略分析——基于中国教育数字化转型的进展考察[J].中国电化教育,2025,(6):18-27.
(1)为保护部分国家敏感数据,图中仅展示相对水平,不标注具体得分。
基本信息:
中图分类号:G434;G511
引用信息:
[1]刘梦彧,潘静文,陈莺,等.智慧教育发展类型与路径研究——基于中国与东南亚国家智慧教育发展现状的比较考察[J].中国电化教育,2026,No.475(08):110-117+142.
2026-08-06
2026-08-06