nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 04, No.447 66-72+128
指向知识结构化的循证实践:意义、向度与路径
基金项目(Foundation): 全国教育科学“十四五”规划2022年度教育部重点课题“导向深度学习的知识结构化循证课例及行动路径研究”(课题编号:DHA220503)研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2024-04-10
出版时间: 2024-04-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

知识结构化是课程内容结构化核心要义,也是发展学生学科核心素养的重要前提和基础。以知识结构化为目标的循证实践,将“最佳教学证据”与“教师个体经验”相结合,有助于实现基于证据的深度学习与深度教学、促进学科知识向学科素养的转化、提升以知识内化为目标的课堂效率。为全面认识知识结构化的特征、性质和样态,基于存在论、认识论和方法论对知识结构化的内涵和要求进行分析,从知识的本体结构化、认知结构化和实践结构化三个结构向度厘清知识结构化循证实践的研究内容,以便从多结构视角探查和评估知识结构化问题并获得相关证据,进而实施基于“证据+经验”的有效教学干预,促进学生形成组织有序、逻辑清晰、功能完整的知识结构。面对当前知识结构化研究证据数量不足,科学性、可靠性、解释力不佳的现状,将循证实践“5A”框架与德金教育行动研究模式进行整合,构建了循证知识结构化的实践框架,并针对证据的获取、应用和评估等方面的设计和实施提出相应对策,为一线教师的实践操作提供更为清晰的指向。

Abstract:

Knowledge structuralization is the core essence of curriculum content structuring, and it is also an important prerequisite and foundation for developing key competencies of discipline. Evidence based practice with the goal of knowledge structuring, combining "best teaching evidence" with "individual teacher experience", is conducive to the realize evidence-based deep learning and deep teaching,promote the transformation of discipline knowledge into competencies, and improve classroom efficiency with the goal of knowledge internalization. In order to comprehensively understand the characteristics, nature, and modality of knowledge structuralization, this paper analyzes the connotation and requirements of knowledge structuralization based on ontology, epistemology and methodology, and clarifies the research content of evidence-based practice of knowledge structuralization from three structural dimensions: ontology structuring, cognitive structuring, and practical structuring, it is helpful to explore and evaluate knowledge structuralization problems from a multidimensional structural perspective and obtain relevant evidence, and then implement effective teaching interventions based on "evidence+experience",promoting students to form an orderly, logical and functional knowledge structure. Facing with the current situation of insufficient evidence,poor scientificity, reliability and interpretability of knowledge structuralization research, this paper integrate the evidence-based practice "5A" framework with the Dekin education action research model, constructs a practical framework of evidence-based knowledge structuralization,and proposes corresponding strategies for the design and implementation of evidence acquisition, application and evaluation, so as to provide a clearer direction for front-line teachers' practical operation.

参考文献

[1]李霞.循证教育:英国的实践探索[J].比较教育研究,2021,(8):71-78.

[2]Grover J.(Russ) Whitehurst.Evidence-based Education(EBE)[EB/OL].https://ies.ed.gov/director/pdf/2002_10.pdf,2002-10-08.

[3]杨文登,叶浩生.社会科学的三次“科学化”浪潮:从实证研究、社会技术到循证实践[J].社会科学,2012,(8):107-116.

[4]中华人民共和国教育部.普通高中课程方案(2017年版2020年修订)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2020.

[5][美]布鲁纳.邵瑞珍,王承绪译.布鲁纳教育论著选·教育过程[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1989.

[6]何先友,莫雷.奥苏伯尔论认知结构、知识获得与课堂教学模式[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),1998,(3):50-56.

[7]夏征农.辞海(1999年缩印版)[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2000.

[8]文雯,许甜等.把教育带回来--迈克尔·扬对社会建构主义的超越与启示[J].教育研究,2016,(3):155-159.

[9]刘大椿.科学哲学通论[J].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998.114.

[10]陈佑清,余潇.学习中心教学论[J].课程·教材·教法,2019,(11):89-96.

[11]叶秀山.欧洲哲学从“知识论”到“存在论”的“转向”[J].江苏行政学院学报,2014,(1):5-12.

[12][13]昌家立.试论知识的本质[J].青海社会科学,1995,(4):50-55.

[14]中国人民大学哲学院逻辑学教研室.逻辑学(第3版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.3-11.

[15]高文.建构主义研究的哲学与心理学基础[J].全球教育展望,2001,(3):3-9.

[16]张建伟,陈琦.从认知主义到建构主义[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1996,(4):75-82.

[17][英]乔纳森·格里斯.孙冰洁,王亮译.研究方法的第一本书[M].沈阳:东北财经大学出版社,2011.59.

[18][德]黑格尔.贺麟译.小逻辑[M].北京:商务印书馆,1980.427.

[19]郭元祥.知识的性质、结构与深度教学[J].课程.教材.教法,2009,(11):17-23.

[20]陶德麟.马克思主义哲学原理(修订本)[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1999.68.

[21]乔丽英,赵兰香.吉登斯结构化理论研究--对结构化理论中结构概念的深度审视[J].前沿,2007,(11):183-186.

[22][英]迈克尔·扬.谢维和,王晓阳译.未来的课程[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003.33.

[23]董艳.教育研究的方法与工具[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2014.128-129.

[24]DAVIES P.What is evidence-based education?[J].British Journal of Educational Studies,1999,47(2):108-121.

[25]CRAWFODR R,TAN H.Responding to evidence-based practice:An examination of mixed methods research in teacher education[J].The Australian Educational Researcher,2019,(46):775-797.

[26]U.S.Department of Education.Using evidence to strengthen education investments[EB/OL].https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/guidanceuseseinvestment.pdf,2016-09-16.

[27][荷兰]格特·比斯塔.张立平,韩亚菲译.测量时代的好教育:伦理、政治和民主的维度[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2019.33.

[28]张羽,刘惠琴等.指向教育实践改进的系统范式--主流教育研究范式的危机与重构[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(4):78-90.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G420

引用信息:

[1]童文昭,王后雄.指向知识结构化的循证实践:意义、向度与路径[J].中国电化教育,2024,No.447(04):66-72+128.

基金信息:

全国教育科学“十四五”规划2022年度教育部重点课题“导向深度学习的知识结构化循证课例及行动路径研究”(课题编号:DHA220503)研究成果

发布时间:

2024-04-10

出版时间:

2024-04-10

检 索 高级检索