nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 06, No.449 94-101
混合式教学中技术赋能评价的实践及效果研究——基于国家一流课程《英语高级写作》的质性分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社科基金项目“高校外语教师评价素养发展路径研究”(项目编号:20BYY104)阶段性研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2024-06-10
出版时间: 2024-06-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

限于人工智能发展的历史进程,技术运用在外语教学评价中也存在不可避免的变革与挑战。机械式数据堆砌、教师评价技能僵化以及师生课堂失语等现象均导致教学评价过程中的关键信息无法被充分捕捉和理解,也弱化了技术的功能。因此,技术赋能应更加注重教师的专业评价素养与学生个性化评价需求。该研究采用质性研究方法,以线上线下混合式国家级一流课程《英语高级写作》课堂作为观察对象,通过课堂观察、教学日志和访谈等方式收集数据,重点探讨了技术在课前、课中、课后的使用情况及其效果。研究结果表明,通过技术赋能,混合式英语写作课课堂评价范式得以成功转变,有效实现了评价的“三阶功能”,即以评促教、以评促学、评价为学。而且,学习者对该混合式评价模式的整体接受度与满意度较高。研究有利于推进混合式课堂评价实践中技术与人文的和谐共生,满足学生个性化评价需求,实现评价的循环发展。

Abstract:

Restricted by the historical development of artificial intelligence, the application of technology in foreign language teaching and learning assessment faces inevitable changes and challenges. Phenomena such as mechanical data accumulation, rigid teacher assessment skills, and classroom silence between instructors and students have all resulted in insufficient capturing and understanding of key information in the assessing process, thereby weakening the functionality of technology. Therefore, technology empowerment should pay more attention to teachers' professional assessment literacy and students' personalized assessment needs. This study adopts a qualitative research method, and takes the blended online-offline national first-class course “Advanced English Writing” as the observation subject. Data was collected through classroom observations, teaching journals, and interviews, focusing on the usage and effects of technology before, during, and after class.Research finds that through technology empowerment, the assessment paradigm in the blended English writing class has been successfully transformed, effectively achieving the “three-tier function” of assessment: assessment of learning, assessment for learning, and assessment as learning. Students also demonstrate a higher level of overall acceptance and satisfaction towards this blended model. This research is conducive to promoting the harmonious coexistence of technology and humanities in blended assessment practices, meeting students' personalized assessment needs, and achieving cyclical development of assessment.

参考文献

[1]中华人民共和国教育部.《教育部关于一流本科课程建设的实施意见》[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201910/t20191031_406269.html,2023-05-27.

[2]金石,王璐露等.线上线下混合式教学的反思与策略优化[J].中国大学教学,2021,(11):72-77.

[3]Black,P.,William,D.Classroom assessment and pedagogy[J].Assessment in education:Principles,policy&practice,2018,25(6):551-575.

[4]Wang,L.,Lee,I.,et al.Chinese university EFL teachers’beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment[J].Studies in Educational Evaluation,2020,66(1):108-119.

[5]曹树真,付杨等.从技术植入到生态优化:信息技术赋能课堂教学的范式转型[J].中国电化教育,2021,(12):103-110.

[6]雷朝滋.教育信息化:从1.0走向2.0--新时代我国教育信息化发展的走向与思路[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2018,(1):98-103+164.

[7]胡杰辉.混合式外语教学的理论内涵与研究范式[J].外语界,2021,(4):2-10.

[8]Meri-Yilan S,Koruyan K.ICT-Based Assessment,Methods,and Programs in Tertiary Education[M].Hershey,Pennsylvania:IGI Global,2020.

[9]Maddux,C.Educational microcomputing:The need for research[J].Computers in the Schools,1984,1(1):35-42.

[10]Gruba,P.,Hinkelman,D.Blending technologies in second language classrooms[M].New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2012.

[11]何克抗.我国教育信息化理论研究新进展[J].中国电化教育,2011,(1):1-19.

[12]徐锦芬,李高新等.线上线下融合情境下大学外语教师能力框架构建[J].外语界,2021,(4):11-18.

[13]王亚沁.基于产出导向法理论的大学英语混合式教学模式构建与实践研究[J].中国电化教育,2022,(11):117-122.

[14]关成勇,郭万群.混合式教学环境下基于POA的英语应用文写作多元评价辩证研究[J].外语电化教学,2021,(2):30-36+5.

[15]许悦婷.外语教师课堂评估素质研究述评[J].外语测试与教学,2013,(4):42-50.

[16]Lee,J.,Butler,Y.G.Reconceptualizing language assessment literacy:Where are language learners?[J].TESOL Quarterly,2020,54(4):1098-1111.

[17]Hill,K.,Mc Namara,T.Developing a comprehensive,empirically based research framework for classroom-based assessment[J].Language testing,2012,29(3):395-420.

[18]Danniels,E.,Pyle,A.,et al.The role of technology in supporting classroom assessment in play-based kindergarten[J].Teaching and Teacher Education,2021,88(1):129-166.

[19]赵磊磊,蒋馨培等.智能时代教师评价素养:培育向度与困境突破[J].杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版),2023,(4):88-96.

[20]王一岩,王杨春晓等.多模态学习分析:“多模态”驱动的智能教育研究新趋向[J].中国电化教育,2021,(3):88-96.

[21]高琳琳,解月光等.智慧课堂视域下高阶思维发展的干预策略体系研究[J].中国电化教育,2022,(6):112-119+133.

[22]郭洪瑞.学生评价素养的国外研究及其启示[J].中国考试,2022,(12):70-79.

[23]毕进杰.从工具走向价值:教育政策执行的理性回归[J].现代教育管理,2019,(10):71-76.

基本信息:

中图分类号:H319.3;G434

引用信息:

[1]黄广芳,苏楠.混合式教学中技术赋能评价的实践及效果研究——基于国家一流课程《英语高级写作》的质性分析[J].中国电化教育,2024,No.449(06):94-101.

基金信息:

国家社科基金项目“高校外语教师评价素养发展路径研究”(项目编号:20BYY104)阶段性研究成果

发布时间:

2024-06-10

出版时间:

2024-06-10

检 索 高级检索