nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2023, 05, No.436 87-94
“双减”政策评估的利益相关者视角:以教师教学表现为依据
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社科基金2022年教育学重点项目“‘双减’政策落实的过程监测和成效评价研究”(课题编号:AHA220020)研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

教育政策评估是调控政策执行过程、合理配置资源并决定政策持续进行与修正的基本依据。伴随着政策评估方式的改进,注重利益相关群体的第四代评估成为趋势。在“双减”政策执行过程中,教师教学表现是衡量课堂教学提质增效及课后服务效果的重要依据。经调研发现教师群体的整体表现情况良好,学生负担得以减轻。但在教学设计的备课时间有待保证,课堂教学质量需要进一步提升,学生的作业负担有待缓解,课后服务保障机制需要改善,特定教师群体在教学表现上尚有差距。该文从推动“双减”政策的落地见效及深入推进,借助集体备课的形式提高教学设计水平并确保备课时间,打造高质量的课堂教学,创新作业的设计理念、类型和标准,建构完善课后服务保障机制,给予特定教师群体多样化的支持等方面,提出“双减”政策评估的改进建议。

Abstract:

Education policy evaluation is the basic basis for regulating the policy implementation process, allocating resources reasonably, and determining the continuous implementation and revision of policies. With the improvement of policy evaluation methods, the fourth generation evaluation focusing on stakeholder groups has become a trend. During the implementation of the “Double Reduction” policy, teachers' teaching performance is an important basis for measuring the quality and efficiency of classroom teaching and the after-class service effect. After investigation, it was found that the overall performance of the teacher group was good and the burden of students was reduced. However, the preparation time of teaching design needs to be guaranteed,the quality of classroom teaching needs to be further improved, the burden of students' homework needs to be relieved, the afterschool service guarantee mechanism needs to be improved, and there is still a gap in the teaching performance of specific groups of teachers. This paper puts forward suggestions for improving the evaluation of the “Double Reduction” policy from the following aspects: promoting the implementation of the “Double Reduction” policy to take effect and promote it further, improving the level of teaching design and ensuring the time of preparing lessons by means of collective preparation, creating high-quality classroom teaching, innovating the design concept, type and standard of homework, constructing and improving the after-school service guarantee mechanism, and providing diversified support measures to specific teachers.

参考文献

[1]H.K.科尔巴奇.张毅等译.政策[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2005.64-69.

[2]Lasswell H D.The emerging conception of the policy sciences[J].Policy sciences,1970,1(1):3-14.

[3]Dror Y.Public Policymaking:Reexamined[M].New York:Routledge Press,2017.120-128.

[4]袁振国.教育政策学[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2001.347-349.

[5]Vedung E.Four waves of evaluation difusion[J].Evaluation,2010,16(3):263-277.

[6]黄明东,陈越等.教育政策效果评估指标体系构建研究--基于后实证主义方法论的视角[J].教育发展研究,2016,36(1):1-6.

[7]张志勇,贾瑜.自信与反思:从PISA2018看我国基础教育改革走向[J].中国教育学刊,2020,(1):1-6.

[8]蔡辰梅.教育变革中教师自我认同的时间困境及其重建[J].教育研究,2015,36(7):89-97.

[9]杨燕.“双减”政策执行的理论逻辑、现实问题与进路--基于利益原则和对X省的大样本调查[J].中国电化教育,2022,(5):26-34.

[10]郑东辉.融入作业过程,提高作业质量[J].人民教育,2021,(Z1):31-33.

[11]雷朝滋.教育信息化:从1.0走向2.0--新时代我国教育信息化发展的走向与思路[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2018,36(1):98-103+164.

[12]张志勇.“双减”背后教育观念的大变革[N].中国教育报,2021-08-07(01).

[13]刘桂秋.有效教学概念新探--综合有效教学观之下的有效教学[J].课程.教材.教法,2008,(9):11-15+44.

[14]史大胜,李立等.“双减”政策背景下小学课后服务研究:现状、问题与对策--基于云南省H市九县一区的调查分析[J].中国电化教育,2022,(11):17-22+31.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G632.4

引用信息:

[1]侯浩翔,刘志,罗枭,等.“双减”政策评估的利益相关者视角:以教师教学表现为依据[J].中国电化教育,2023,No.436(05):87-94.

基金信息:

国家社科基金2022年教育学重点项目“‘双减’政策落实的过程监测和成效评价研究”(课题编号:AHA220020)研究成果

发布时间:

2023-05-09

出版时间:

2023-05-09

检 索 高级检索