| 2,104 | 61 | 194 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
师生交互是翻转教学成功的重要因素,该文在构建师生交互理论框架的基础上,设计出有较高信度和效度的问卷,以一所地方高校为样本进行实证分析,结果表明:学习者参与师生交互的总体情况不理想,并且学生在师生交互的不同维度上存在差异。其中,交互数量和交互范围两个维度较好,其他维度上还需要改进;年级不同的学生在师生交互整体上存在显著差异,在交互范围、交互数量、交互内容和交互强度上也存在显著差异,对网络依赖不同的学生在交互范围与交互距离上存在显著差异,其他情况均不存在显著差异。因此,教师要营造以学生为中心的学习环境,通过持续的学习支持充分发挥引领作用,并针对学生的个体差异,调整师生交互的侧重点,把学生对网络的依赖性转化为参与师生交互的积极性,实现高效的师生交互,促进翻转教学实践的持续改进。
Abstract:Teacher-student interaction is necessary for the success of Flipped Classroom. Based on the deep analysis of the framework of teacher-student interaction, a questionnaire was designed and an investigation was conducted, the empirical analysis results show that, teacher-student interaction in Flipped Classroom is not satisfying, differences exist in the different dimensions of teacher-student interaction, among which interaction range and interaction number are better, the other dimensions are need to be improved. The difference in the grade will bring significant differences in teacher-student interactions as a whole, and also cause significant differences in interaction range, interaction number, interaction content, and interaction strength. Different degree of dependence on internet will create significant differences in interaction range and interaction distance. There is no significant difference on other occasions. Thus, a learner-centered approaches and learning scaffold are needed in flipped classroom, the teacher can guide the learners by learning supports in Flipped Classroom, design various interactive activities according to the individual difference of students, try to transform the dependency on internet into the motivation to interaction, to realize the fruitful teacherstudent interaction, and improve the Flipped Classroom constantly.
[1][2]赵兴龙.翻转教学的先进性与局限性[J].中国教育学刊,2013,(4):65-68.
[3]何克抗.从“翻转课堂”的本质,看“翻转课堂”在我国的未来发展[J].电化教育研究,2014,(7):5-16.
[4]钱研,陈晓慧.南加州大学翻转课堂设计原则及其启示[J].中国电化教育,2015,(6):99-103.
[5]谢幼如等.融合翻转课堂与MOOCs的高校MF教学模式[J].中国电化教育,2015,(10):40-45.
[6]郭绍青,杨滨.高校微课“趋同进化”教学设计促进翻转课堂教学策略研究[J].中国电化教育,2014,(4):90-103.
[7]叶冬莲.基于翻转课堂的参与式教学模式师生互动效果研究[J].现代教育技术,2014,(12):77-83.
[8]Bryan Goodwin&Kirsten Mille.Research says evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in[J].Educational leadership,2013,(3):78-80.
[9]邵伏先.人际交往心理学[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1988.37-39.
[10][15]吴安艳,熊才平等.网络通讯环境下的师生互动变革研究[J].远程教育杂志,2011,(3):60-65.
[11][13]曾祥跃.生态学视野下的远程教育教学交互分类模型[J].中国电化教育,2012,(2):36-41.
[12]叶子,庞丽娟.师生互动的本质与特征[J].教育研究,2001,(4):30-35.
[14]吴康宁.课堂教学社会学[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,1999.195-207.
[16]焦广兰.浅析交互距离理论及其对学习支持服务的指导意义[J].现代教育技术,2006,(2):30-32.
[17]Sing,C.C.and Khine,M.S.An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in online community[J].Educational Technology&Society,2006,(1):250-261.
[18]吴明隆.spss统计应用实务[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2001.80.
[19]A review of flipped learning[DB/OL].http://www.flippedlearning.org/review,2016-02-01.
[20]G.R.Overmyer.The flipped classroom model for college algebra,effects on student achievement[D].Fort Collins:Colorado State University,2014.3.
[21]The Four Pillars of flip[DB/OL].fttp://flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/va01923112/centricity/domain/46/flip_handout_fnl_web.pdf,2016-01-07.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G434
引用信息:
[1]徐恩芹,徐连荣,崔光佐.师生交互的个体差异研究——基于翻转课堂的个案调查与分析[J].中国电化教育,2016,No.355(08):67-73.
基金信息:
国家社科基金教育学一般课题“课堂交互产生学习结果的认知模型与仿真研究”(课题编号:BCA100023);; 山东省“十二五”教育科学规划课题“教师在线培训中的学习绩效研究”(课题编号:2013GG053)的成果
2016-08-22
2016-08-22
2016-08-22