nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2021, 11, No.418 16-23
中小学课后服务能促进教育公平吗——基于东中西部6省(自治区)32个县(区)调查数据的分析
基金项目(Foundation): 全国教育科学“十三五规划”2018年度国家一般课题“教育信息化支持农村教学点发展实践模式研究”(课题编号:BHA180150)研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

中小学课后服务由学校发挥主渠道作用,让所有学生接受同等质量的教育,对于保障教育公平具有积极意义。该文在调查分析的基础上,从课后服务保障教育的起点公平、过程公平和结果公平的角度进行了研究。结果显示参加课后服务的学生整体比例不高,且参与率随着家庭经济条件升高而升高,低收入家庭学生参加课后服务的比例偏低,课后服务未能完全保障教育起点公平;中低收入家庭学生在参加作业、自主阅读、娱乐、拓展训练、兴趣小组等方面的比例与高收入家庭学生大致相当,但参加音乐、美术和科学类课后服务的比例偏低,课后服务部分保障了教育的过程公平;参加课后服务让原本因为不同经济条件导致的成绩差异向相反的方向发生变化,缩小了不同社会经济地位家庭学生在教育结果上存在的不平等,课后服务基本保障了教育的结果公平。该文认为课后服务作为非公共产品的性质决定了其在促进教育公平方面存在一定的局限,但课后服务由学校供给,一定程度上弥补了家庭条件造成的不平等。因此,有必要扩大课后服务范围,保障低收入群体学生参加课后服务;突出育人导向,加大学校在课后服务中开展素质教育的支持力度,让课后服务在减轻作业辅导和课外培训负担方面发挥重要作用。

Abstract:

After-school service in primary and secondary schools play the role of the main channel, so that all students receive the same quality of education, which is of positive significance to ensure educational equity. Based on the investigation and analysis, this paper studies the starting point equity, process equity and outcome equity of after-school service guarantee education of China. The results show that the overall proportion of students participating in after-school service is not high, and the participation rate increases with the increase of family economic conditions. The proportion of students from low-income families participating in after-school service is low, and after-school service cannot fully ensure the fairness of the starting point of education; The proportion of students from middle and low-income families in homework, independent reading, entertainment, expansion training and interest groups is roughly the same as that of students from high-income families, but the proportion of after-school service in music, art and science is low, and the after-school service partially ensure the process equity of education; Participation in after-school service changes the performance differences originally caused by different economic conditions in the opposite direction, reduces the inequality in educational outcome of students from families with different socio-economic status, and after-school service basically ensure the fairness of educational outcome. This paper holds that the nature of after-school service as a non-public product determines that it has certain limitations in promoting educational equity, but after-school service is provided by schools, which makes up for the inequality caused by family conditions to a certain extent. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the scope of after-school service to ensure that low-income students participate in after-school service; Highlight the education orientation, increase the support of schools to carry out quality education in after-school service, and let after-school service play an important role in reducing the burden of homework guidance and extracurricular training.

参考文献

[1]新华社.中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅《关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见》[DB/OL].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/24/content_5627132.htm,2021-07-24.

[2]教育部.教育部印发《关于做好中小学生课后服务工作的指导意见》[DB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201703/t20170304_298204.html,2017-03-04.

[3][10][26]郑真江,陈光华.课后托管服务:政策亟须完善[J].社会治理,2017,(5):26-29.

[4]易红郡.历史视野下西方教育公平问题研究--西方教育公平理论的多元化分析[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2010,09(4):5-9.

[5]高毅哲,柯进.三点半后,孩子去哪儿[N].中国教育报,2014-03-10(01).

[6]方超,黄斌.马太效应还是公平效应:家庭教育支出与教育结果不平等的异质性检验[J].教育与经济,2020,(4):58-67.

[7]李佳丽,何瑞珠.家庭教育时间投入、经济投入和青少年发展:社会资本、文化资本和影子教育阐释[J].中国青年研究,2019,(8):97-105.

[8]发改价格[2010]1619号文件,关于规范中小学服务性收费和代收费管理有关问题的通知[Z].

[9]马健生,邹维.”三点半现象”难题及其治理--基于学校多功能视角的分析[J].教育研究,2019,40(4):118-125.

[11]孙志军,刘泽云等.家庭、学校与儿童的学习成绩--基于甘肃省农村地区的研究[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(5):103-115.

[12]Weisman S A,Gottfredson D C.Attrition from after school programs:Characteristics of students who drop out[J].Prevention science,2001,2(3):201-205.

[13]National Research Council and Institute of Medicine.Community programs to promote youth development[M].Washington,DC:National Academy Press,2002.

[14][27]Vandell D L,Reisner E R,Pierce K M.Outcomes Linked to HighQuality Afterschool Programs:Longitudinal Findings from the Study of Promising Afterschool Programs[J].Policy Studies Associates,Inc.,2007,(1):1-9.

[15]Durlak,J.A.,&Weissberg,R.P..The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills[M].Chicago,IL:Collaborative for Academic,Social,and Emotional Learning,2007

[16]辛涛,黄宁.教育公平的终极目标:教育结果公平--对教育结果公平的重新定义[J].教育研究,2009,30(8):24-27.

[17][28]Colemen,J.S.Equality of Educational Opportunity[R].Washington,DC:U.S.Government Printing Office,1966.

[18]赵必华.影响学生学业成绩的家庭与学校因素分析[J].教育研究,2013,34(3):88-97.

[19]姚遂,陈家俊.母亲学历如何影响子女受教育年限--基于CLDS2016的实证分析[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,34(3):87-96.

[20]刘保中,张月云等.家庭社会经济地位与青少年教育期望:父母参与的中介作用[J].北京大学教育评论,2015,13(3):158-176+192.

[21]苏群,仲漫.社会资本视角下父母外出与儿童的自我效能--基于倾向得分匹配法的分析[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(5):311-315.

[22]徐莉.中小学校外培训乱象治理研究--基于学习型社会建设视角[J].中国教育学刊,2014,(5):6-9.

[23]樊卓思.贫困农村地区家庭子女教育投资意愿的影响因素研究--基于Logistic模型的分析[J].教育理论与实践,2016,36(2):27-29.

[24]夏海鹰.农村学校艺术教育发展保障机制研究[J].教育研究,2016,37(7):61-65+148.

[25]教育部.中国教育年鉴2019·全国基本情况·小学分课程专任教师学历情况[DB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A03/moe_560/jytjsj_2019/qg/202006/t20200611_464824.html,2020-06-10.

[29]江苏省教育厅.省教育厅等四部门关于全面推进中小学课后服务进一步提升课后服务水平的实施意见[DB/OL].http://jyt.jiangsu.gov.cn/art/2021/8/13/art_58961_9975308.html,2021-08-13.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G639.2

引用信息:

[1]张伟平,付卫东,李伟,等.中小学课后服务能促进教育公平吗——基于东中西部6省(自治区)32个县(区)调查数据的分析[J].中国电化教育,2021,No.418(11):16-23.

基金信息:

全国教育科学“十三五规划”2018年度国家一般课题“教育信息化支持农村教学点发展实践模式研究”(课题编号:BHA180150)研究成果

发布时间:

2021-11-06

出版时间:

2021-11-06

检 索 高级检索