nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 09, No.476 91-95
基于教育“三维属性”的高水平中外合作办学的使命重构与路径优化
基金项目(Foundation): 北京市教育科学“十四五”规划2024年度“落实教育强国部署”专项课题“世界发达国家教育改革发展趋势研究”(课题编号:AHBA24554)研究成果
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-09-07
出版时间: 2026-09-07
移动端阅读
摘要:

在教育强国建设战略背景下,高水平中外合作办学已由单纯的跨境教育供给形式转向嵌入国家创新体系与全球教育治理结构的制度性安排。然而,现有研究多基于教育国际化或功能主义理论视角,侧重资源引进与人才培养等工具性功能,对其在国家治理体系中的制度定位关注不足,难以有效解释其在战略协同、制度约束与公共责任之间的治理逻辑。该文引入国家治理理论,将教育“三维属性”由规范性政策话语转化为分析教育制度运行的理论框架,以此构建高水平中外合作办学的整体性解释框架。高水平中外合作办学实现了由资源供给工具向复合治理单元的功能跃迁,其使命重构体现为价值引领、战略服务与公共服务三个功能向度,并据此提出“精准定位—模式创新—数字赋能—战略整合”四位一体路径优化,为教育强国建设背景下高水平中外合作办学高质量发展提供了理论解释与实践方案。

Abstract:

Against the strategic background of accelerating the construction of a leading country in education, high-level Chinese-foreign cooperation in running schools(CFCRS) has evolved from a simple form of cross-border education provision into an institutional arrangement embedded in the national innovation system and the global education governance structure. However, existing studies have predominantly approached CFCRS from the perspectives of educational internationalization or functionalist theory, emphasizing its instrumental roles in resource introduction and talent cultivation while paying insufficient attention to its institutional positioning within the national governance system. Consequently, they have failed to adequately explain the governance logic through which high-level CFCRS balances strategic coordination, institutional constraints, and public responsibility. Grounded in the political, strategic, and people-oriented attributes of education and informed by state governance theory, this paper transforms the “three-dimensional attributes” from a normative policy discourse into an operational analytical paradigm and constructs an integrated explanatory framework for high-level CFCRS. On this basis, the paper reveals high-level CFCRS from a resource provision tool into a composite governance unit. It further elucidates the logic of its mission reconstruction from the three functional dimensions of value guidance, strategic support, and public service, and proposes an integrated four-dimensional pathway consisting of precise positioning, model innovation, AI-Enabled Digital empowerment, and strategic integration within the synergistic framework of the threedimensional attributes. The study argues that the core value of high-level CFCRS lies in achieving institutional coupling between the introduction of high-quality international educational resources and national governance objectives. Through institutional innovation, it generates spillover effects on the domestic higher education system and provides structural support for building a leading country in education. From the perspective of state governance, this paper offers an explanatory theoretical framework and the practical pathway for transforming CFCRS from a factor-driven model to a governance-embedded model.

参考文献

[1]新华社.习近平主持中央政治局第五次集体学习并发表重要讲话[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202305/content_6883632.htm?de-vice=app,2023-05-29.

[2]习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm,2022-10-16.

[3]新华社.中共中央、国务院印发《教育强国建设规划纲要(2024-2035年)》[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/2025/issue_11846/202502/content_7002799.html,2025-01-19.

[4]中华人民共和国国务院令第372号.《中华人民共和国中外合作办学条例》[EB/OL].https://hudong.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/gk_gbgg/moe_0/moe_9/moe_35/tnull_96.html,2003-03-01/2026-07-12.

[5]Parsons,T. The School Class as a Social System:Some of Its Functions in American Society[J].Harvard Educational Review,1959,29(4):297-318.

[6]Schultz,T. W. Investment in Human Capital[J]. The American Economic Review,1961,51(1):1-17.

[7]Evans,P.Embedded Autonomy:States and Industrial Transformation[M].New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1995.

[8]Jessop,B.State Theory:Putting the Capitalist State in its Place[M].University Park:Pennsylvania State University Press,1990.

[9]Marginson,S. Competition and Markets in Higher Education:A‘Glonacal’Analysis[J].Policy Futures in Education,2004,2(2):175-244.

[10]Altbach,P.G.,Knight,J.The Internationalization of Higher Education:Motivations and Realities[J].Journal of Studies in International Education,2007,11(3-4):290-305.

[11]教育部.教育部继续支持以中外合作办学等方式缓解疫情影响下我学生出国学习困难[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202207/t20220728_649322.html,2022-07-28.

[12]Knight,J.Knowledge Diplomacy:A Definition and Conceptual Framework[A].Knowledge Diplomacy in International Relations and Higher Education[C].Cham:Springer,2022.99-111.

[13]段世飞,钱跳跳.虚拟国际化:概念、动因与机制[J].比较教育研究,2024,46(2):103-112.

[14]Marginson,S. What is global higher education?[J].Oxford Review of Education,2022,48(4):492-517.

[15]De Wit,H.,Altbach,P.G.Internationalization in Higher Education:Global Trends and Recommendations for Its Future[J].Policy Reviews in Higher Education,2021,5(1):28-46.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G648.9

引用信息:

[1]吕睿鑫,高益民.基于教育“三维属性”的高水平中外合作办学的使命重构与路径优化[J].中国电化教育,2026,No.476(09):91-95.

基金信息:

北京市教育科学“十四五”规划2024年度“落实教育强国部署”专项课题“世界发达国家教育改革发展趋势研究”(课题编号:AHBA24554)研究成果

发布时间:

2026-09-07

出版时间:

2026-09-07

检 索 高级检索