| 540 | 0 | 150 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
课程思政与国家话语能力培养的深度融合,既是落实立德树人根本任务的关键路径,也是服务国家战略需求的必然选择,而数智技术则为二者协同发展提供了核心动能与赋能支撑。针对当前两者在融合实践中存在的价值塑造与能力培养相脱节、数智化应用流于形式等结构性问题,该研究构建了以数智技术为贯穿性赋能主线、以“价值引领—能力生成”协同为核心逻辑的融合模式。该模式涵盖“目标协同—内容重构—教学创新—教师发展—评价反馈”五大动态循环运行环节,旨在实现思政价值内化与话语能力外显的有机统一。经过一学期准实验研究验证,该模式显著提升了学生的国家话语综合能力,并有效促进了思政素养的内化。研究进一步从国家、院校、师生三个层面提出系统化的实施路径与多维保障体系,以期为数智时代高校英语教育改革提供可资借鉴的实践范式。
Abstract:The in-depth integration of curriculum-based ideological and political education and the cultivation of national discourse competence is not only a key approach to fulfilling the fundamental task of fostering virtue through education, but also an inevitable choice to serve the strategic needs of the country. Digital technology provides core impetus and enabling support for the coordinated development of the two. In view of the structural problems in current integration practices, such as the disconnection between value cultivation and competency development and the formalistic application of digitalization, this study constructs an integration model with digital technology as the pervasive empowerment mainline and the synergy of “value guidance—competence generation” as the core logic. The model consists of five dynamically cyclic operational links: goal coordination, content reconstruction, teaching innovation, teacher development, and evaluation and feedback, aiming to achieve the organic unity of the internalization of ideological and political values and the externalization of discourse competence. Verified by a quasi-experimental study conducted over one semester, the model has significantly improved students' comprehensive national discourse competence and effectively promoted the internalization of their ideological and political literacy. Furthermore, this study proposes systematic implementation paths and a multidimensional guarantee system from the perspectives of the state, institutions, teachers and students, to provide a practical paradigm for reference in the reform of college English education in the digital age.
[1]文秋芳.大学外语课程思政的内涵和实施框架[J].中国外语,2021,18(2):47-52.
[2]教高[2020]3号,教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[Z].
[3]孙有中.外语教育与跨文化能力培养[J].中国外语,2016,13(3):1+17-22.
[4]张文霞,赵华敏等.大学外语教师课程思政教学能力现状及发展需求研究[J].外语界,2022,(3):28-36.
[5]习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm,2022-10-25.
[6]祝智庭,胡姣.教育数字化转型的理论框架[J].中国教育学刊,2022,(4):41-49.
[7]季月,李霄翔.外语课程思政的创新:一个自我与认知-情绪的视角[J].外语电化教学,2022,(4):18-22+111.
[8]何莲珍.新时代大学英语教学的新要求——《大学英语教学指南》修订依据与要点[J].外语界,2020,(4):13-18.
[9]徐锦芬.高校英语课程教学素材的思政内容建设研究[J].外语界,2021,(2):18-24.
[10]胡杰辉.新工科背景下的大学外语课程建设理念与策略[J].中国外语,2023,20(5):4-10.
[11]孟小军,杨清.数智时代教师教育重构的三重动因、三维矩阵及四向进路[J].中国电化教育,2025,(12):90-97+127.
[12]余胜泉,刘亚娟.AI辅助的语言运用教学模型[J].中国电化教育,2026,(3):1-9.
[13]逯行,黄荣怀.教育数字化转型期的现代化风险观照及其治理研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,44(3):54-64.
[14]谢幼如,邱艺等.数字化转型赋能高校课程思政的实施进路与评价创新[J].中国电化教育,2022,(9):7-15.
[15]郑尚东,张洋.大数据和大模型双轮驱动精准思政的三重向度[J].教育与装备研究,2025,(5):46-50.
[16]杨扬,王琳.数智时代口译能力的个性化认知诊断评价探究[J].中国电化教育,2025,(10):95-103.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G434;H319.3
引用信息:
[1]任志芬,董晓波.数智赋能大学英语课程思政与国家话语能力融合模式研究[J].中国电化教育,2026,No.476(09):130-137.
基金信息:
2026年河南省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目“中华文化传承发展视域下殷商文化外译传播与外语专业实践教学一体化研究”(课题编号:657); 2027年度河南省高等学校人文社会科学研究一般项目“轴心文明视域下中原法家思想外译与国家法治形象建构研究”(立项编号:243)研究成果
2026-09-07
2026-09-07