nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 09, No.476 74-82+90
中小学校长数字化转型领导力的测评与应用
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2026-09-07
出版时间: 2026-09-07
移动端阅读
摘要:

立足于中小学校长数字化转型领导力的进阶发展需求,该研究首先对教育数字化转型相关的政策文本与学术文献进行内容分析,对17位中小学校长、教育技术学专家的访谈文本进行编码分析,通过两轮德尔菲法初步形成了中小学校长数字化转型领导力测评框架,并确定了一、二级指标的权重系数。随后,基于测评框架开发测评量表,通过因子分析、聚敛效度分析等方法验证表明量表的信效度科学有效。最后,基于测评量表对北京市、上海市、四川省N市的243位中小学校长的数字化转型领导力水平进行实证调查。研究通过差异检验发现中小学校长的数字化转型领导力分别在经济发达与欠发达地区、公办与民办学校、小学~/初中~/高中、校长最高学历等不同变量的群组划分下存在差异。此外,通过K-means聚类分析方法,研究将中小学校长分为4种类型,进而为不同类型的中小学校长提出针对性的提升策略。

Abstract:

In response to the evolving needs for the advancement of K-12 principals' digital transformation leadership, this study conducted content analysis of policy documents and academic literature related to educational digital transformation. In-depth interviews were carried out with 17 school principals and experts in educational technology, and the interview data were analyzed through coding. Based on two rounds of the Delphi method, a measurement framework for principals' digital transformation leadership was constructed, and the weight coefficients for primary and secondary indicators were determined. Subsequently, a measurement scale was developed based on the framework. The reliability and validity of the scale were confirmed through factor analysis and convergent validity testing, demonstrating its scientific soundness. Finally, using the scale, an empirical survey was conducted with 243 principals from Beijing, Shanghai, and a certain city in Sichuan Province. Difference tests indicated that principals' digital transformation leadership varied significantly across multiple grouping variables, including economically developed versus underdeveloped regions, public versus private schools, school level(primary, junior high, and senior high), and principals' highest educational attainment. In addition, a K-means cluster analysis was performed to classify principals into four distinct leadership profiles. Based on these findings, targeted improvement strategies were proposed for different principals.

参考文献

[1]中华人民共和国教育部.中国智慧教育白皮书及国家教育数字化战略行动2.0启动信息[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/2025/2025_zt06/cgfb/202505/t20250507_1189603.html,2025-11-27.

[2]教办[2025]3号,教育部等九部门关于加快推进教育数字化的意见[Z].

[3]梁娟.教育数字化转型背景下高职教师数字素养发展的意义、困境与路径[J].教育与装备研究,2024,40(2):22-26.

[4]张敏,杜冉.智能精准教研:指向教研数字化转型的实践探索[J].教育与装备研究,2023,39(10):60-66.

[5]马燕燕.教育数字化转型的深度实践——智慧体育的特点与路径探索[J].教育与装备研究,2025,41(9):66-71.

[6]余胜泉.教育数字化转型的关键路径[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2023,41(3):62-71.

[7]顾小清,胡碧皓.教育数字化转型及学校应变[J].人民教育,2023,(2):47-50.

[8]郑璐,胡淑云.新时代高质量中小学名校长培养的理论依归与路径选择[J].教育科学研究,2023,(11):38-44.

[9]杨鑫,解月光等.校长信息化教学领导力模型构建及发展途径[J].现代远程教育研究,2018,(4):34-40+48.

[10]王永军.面向教育4.0的创新发展:中小学校长信息化领导力框架之构建[J].远程教育杂志,2020,38(6):41-49.

[11]曹培杰.面向教育数字化转型的校长领导力重构[J].中小学管理,2023,(1):9-12.

[12]杨鑫,苟睿等.校长数据领导力:落实国家教育数字化战略的关键能力[J].中国电化教育,2023,(5):65-73.

[13]郁晓华,王津钰.量子领导者:教育数字化转型下学校CIO的能力转变[J].远程教育杂志,2023,41(3):55-64.

[14]张立国,周釜宇等.面向教育新基建的中小学校长信息化领导力评价量表设计[J].中国远程教育,2023,43(3):64-72.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G637.1;G434

引用信息:

[1]李姗姗,林易,曾诚则,等.中小学校长数字化转型领导力的测评与应用[J].中国电化教育,2026,No.476(09):74-82+90.

发布时间:

2026-09-07

出版时间:

2026-09-07

检 索 高级检索